近年来关于“中国模式”研究综述

近年来,学术界围绕＂中国模式＂的历史背景、主要内涵、主要内容、基本特征、主要问题和重大意义等几个方面进行论述,凸显了＂中国模式＂研究的初始性特征。正因为如此,当前的研究还存在一些不足之处也就在所难免。     

The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: an analysis of three European countries and the European Union

The increasing complexity of policy problems, coupled with the political desire to base new policies on the foundation of firm evidence, has accelerated the development of policy assessment tools. These range from complex computer models and cost benefit analysis through simple checklists and decision trees. In the last decade, many governments have established formal policy assessment systems to harness these tools in order to facilitate more evidence-based policy making. These tools are potentially widely available, but to what extent are they used by policy makers and what becomes of the evidence that they generate? This paper addresses these questions by studying the empirical patterns of tool use across 37 cases in three European countries and the European Commission. It uses a simple classification of tools into advanced, formal and simple types. It finds that even when tools are embedded in policy assessment systems, their use is differentiated and on the whole very limited, in particular when it comes to more advanced tools. It then explores these patterns from contrasting theoretical perspectives to shed light on why, when and how different policy assessment tools are used in the policy process.     

Why do only some people who support parties actually join them? Evidence from Britain

What makes people join a political party is one of the most commonly studied questions in research on party members. Nearly all this research, however, is based on talking to people who have actually joined parties. This article simultaneously analyses surveys of members of political parties in Britain and surveys of non-member supporters of those same parties. This uniquely enables us to model the decision to join parties. The results suggest that most of the elements that constitute the influential ‘General Incentives Model’ are significant. But it also reveals that, while party supporters imagine that selective benefits, social norms and opposing rival parties’ policies are key factors in members’ decisions to join a party, those who actually do so are more likely to say they are motivated by attachments to their party’s values, policies and leaders, as well as by an altruistic desire to support democracy more generally.     

公共服务绩效、公众期望失验与公民满意度

运用实验研究方法,随机分配给被试有关地方政府公共服务绩效的积极或消极信息线索,考察不同性质的公共服务绩效影响公民满意度的边界条件,并进一步考察公众期望失验在公共服务绩效与公民满意度关系中的中介效应.研究表明:与消极绩效相比,积极的绩效更能提高公众对政府的满意度;绩效信息来源在绩效性质影响公民满意度的过程中起着调节作用,...     

基于行动导向的公安行政文书课程教学模式探讨

公安行政文书作为一门基础性的警务课程，是在完成公安任务的具体过程中来体现其实用价值的。公安行政文书的“警务课程”性质，决定了它的课程教学应当定位于“行动导向课程模式”。这种教学模式要求教师创设一种仿真的学习环境和气氛，以学员为中心，以任务为载体，组织并指导学员在完成具体任务的行动中，手脑并用，做学结合，身体力行地荻取专业能力、方法能力和社会能力。     

作为中亚转型国家参考模式的发展型政权

苏联解体20年后,几乎所有的前共产主义国家都程度不同地完成了从计划经济向市场经济的转型.然而,仍然有些转型国家在这一进程中落在后面,其中就有前苏联的5个中亚加盟共和国.对于这些既不同于俄罗斯和东欧,更不同于西方发达国家的国家来说,实现转型没有明显的参照模式.本文的目的就是分析在东亚地区取得成功的"发展型政权"是否也能够为中亚经济体的发展提供一个参考模式.     

元代以来地方行政价值实现的审视--结合“公共管理模型”与“地方行政史例”

基于Christopher Hood公共管理三重价值的视角，选取元以降（元、明、清、民国）四个历史单元为案例，审视和比较其地方行政的演化轨迹、横纵架构和运行成效。尝试一个“西方当代公共管理理论”和“中国古代地方行政实践”相结合的独特研究路径，结合“管理模型”和“史料分析”，构建一个地方行政价值实现的框架模型（LAVAM），探究地方行政的纵向组织层级、横向权力统分与公共管理三重价值——公正、效率、稳健之间的联系与规律，以现代公共管理理论和研究方法剖析元以降地方行政历史演化的客观规律和内在逻辑，启迪地方行政改革与央地关系探索“，以今审古”“、以古鉴今”。     

职业经理人胜任特征研究的中外比较及启示

对于胜任特征问题的研究源于西方心理学,将其引入我国之后,较好地适应了我国经济高速增长的需要。与国外30多年的研究成果相比,国内对于职业经理人胜任特征的研究和应用尚处于初始阶段,我国职业经理人队伍尚不成熟,职业经理人市场还处于萌芽状态,职业经理人市场评价还在探索,职业经理人规则还有待建立。面对中国加入WTO后的挑战,深入研究职业经理人胜任特征模型已成为迫切需要进一步研究的课题。     

Relational Justice in Organizations: The Group-Value Model and Support for Change

This paper examines the psychological dynamics of the Group-Value Model for a behavioral orientation which has seldom been considered in the social justice literature: acceptance and support for change. A field study was conducted, with 176 participants members of an organization which was undergoing a change process. Participants were asked (a) to think of a specific relevant conflict situation with their supervisor; (b) to evaluate supervisor's behavior in that situation, with respect to relational and distributive justice; (c) to state the justice aspects most valued in conflict situations with their supervisor. A test of the model was conducted through a mediation analysis. According to the Group-Value Model (GVM), respect experienced within the group and pride in the group were mediating variables between justice judgements and orientation toward acceptance and support for change in the organization. Interactional and procedural aspects (relational judgements) were the only ones to predict pride, respect, and behavioral orientation, and were also the ones most valued in general conflict situations with the supervisor. The model was also tested at three different levels of analysis: organization as a whole, department, and work group. This confirmed pride and respect within the group as mediating variables between relational justice judgements and orientation toward acceptance and support for change at the department and workgroup levels.