建立宏观调控法律监督与救济机制的现实意义与理论基础

国家宏观调控权的滥用对市场机制基础性作用的地位与私权利保护极易产生损害 ,所以在国内法律赋予国家宏观调控权的同时 ,建立对其有效的法律监督与救济机制已成为当务之急。建立国家宏观调控的法律监督与救济机制 ,具有经济学与法治主义方面的理论根源和权力观念基础。它对我国宏观调控法律研究上升到全面性与系统性之层次以及指导立法实践将有所裨益     

承租人优先购买权的法律救济方式——评《合同法》230条的矛盾性

《中华人民共和国合同法》第230条所规定的承租人优先购买权并未明确救济方式，从逻辑上分析，存在3种救济方式。这3种救济方式有存在的理论根据、优点及不足，并且其也代表了承租人优先购买权的3种性质。房屋承租人优先购买权无论如何定性。在理论上及实务上均存在矛盾。     

Two Models of Monetary Redress: A Structural Analysis

Monetary redress is a developing area of human rights policy. The article examines how a redress program’s design affects the interests of program applicants. It distinguishes two program models, individual assessment and common experience, and explores their differing effects on applicants’ interests. Analyzing two Irish cases, redress for survivors of the industrial schools and the Magdalene laundries, the discussion is applicable to a wide range of redress programs including those in postconflict, transitional justice, and postcolonial contexts.     

国际商事仲裁错误裁决司法审查救济制度的缺陷与克服

内国法院的司法审查对于保障国际商事仲裁的公平公正具有重要而积极的作用。但是,作为当事人权利救济的主要甚或唯一途径,司法审查制度却存在救济范围有限、救济效力不确定、与国际商事仲裁本质不相容等缺陷,限制了仲裁解决国际商事争议的独特优势及潜力的发挥,阻碍了国际商事仲裁的发展。克服这些缺陷的有效方法是仿效国际商品仲裁和国际海事仲裁等实践,设立仲裁内部上诉机制供当事人选择适用。     

非法占有目的司法推定的混乱与匡正——以集资诈骗罪为例

非法占有目的作为主观要素,在认定的时候通常采用司法推定的方式进行,我国将推定的事实基础在司法解释中予以明确规定。但是从宏观角度看,这些规定违反了主、客观关系,违反了责任原则,有客观归罪之嫌;从微观角度看,这些规定出现了很多的不合理结论,给司法实践带来了极大的混乱。在司法推定中应当注重行为作为推定基础事实的作用,在规定上应当采用肯定要素和否定要素相结合的推定模式。     

试论不动产物权登记错误的法律规制

本文在对不动产物权登记错误进行一般分析的基础上，重点剖析了我国关于此问题的制度设计。进而，结合物权立法对实践中适用相关制度时所存在的一些问题做了法律解析。     

法律责任概念的形式构造

凯尔森的法律责任概念体现为不法行为与其所引起的规范效果之间的充分且必要条件关系。运用霍菲尔德的基本法律关系分析框架，这一法律责任概念的形式构造可以转换为不法行为是“狭义权利-狭义义务”或“特权-无权利”救济权法律关系的充分必要条件。这个分析结论可为法律责任机制的正当性提供规范意义上的解说，还可用于澄清学界在行政法、侵权法、国家赔偿法等领域对于法律责任、不法行为的诸多错误认识，从而在各种具体情形中捍卫作为规范性概念的法律责任的精确性与纯粹性。     

浅析传染病病人和传染病疑似病人的人身自由权利

本文通过对传染病病人和传染病疑似病人人身自由权利内涵和外延的分析 ,论证了限制传染病病人和传染病疑似病人人身自由的法律依据。同时 ,本文从制定法的角度评述了传染病病人和传染病疑似病人的法律责任以及对侵害传染病病人和传染病疑似病人人身自由权利的法律救济方式。     

Consumer Redress Legislation: Simplifying or Subverting the Law of Contract

The growth of statutory consumer protection regimes in modern commercial societies has the potential profoundly to disrupt the private law landscape. Such schemes aim to increase access to justice for consumers by offering simplified and clear suites of rights and corresponding remedies. In so doing, however, they affect core areas of private law rights and remedies, and may come to undermine or replace existing contractual principles and policies. The result could be an incoherent system of private law with different principles and rules applying to commercial and consumer transactions. Coherence in the law requires that lawyers abandon their traditional ‘oil and water’ attitudes to legislative schemes and confront directly the interactions between these two bodies of law. This paper engages in that enquiry by considering the relationship between the relatively new consumer redress provisions in the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and general law principles.     

Historical institutional child abuse in Ireland: survivor perspectives on taking part in the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse (CICA) and the redress scheme

This article explores the experience of taking part in the Irish State’s Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse (CICA) and the subsequent redress scheme. The Commission was set up in 2000 with the task of investigating Industrial and Reformatory Schools that were in existence for most of the twentieth century. A redress scheme was also set up by the government to compensate those who were abused in these institutions. 25 qualitative interviews were conducted with male and female Industrial and Reformatory School survivors. The focus of this article is to understand some of the issues that this cohort of survivors faced in taking part in the inquiry and redress process, dealing with issues such as re-traumatisation, retributive justice and procedural justice.