浅析影响司法公正的因素及对策

司法公正已成为现代民主法治国家的特征之一。现实生活中,由于各种因素的制约和影响,司法不公的现象大量存在,这不仅侵犯了公众的合法利益,也放纵了违法犯罪,是对法律的不负责,败坏了司法机关的声誉,而且严重损害了党和政府在群众心目中的形象,很值得我们去认真地研究探讨,寻求解决司法不公的有效途径。     

论客观公正原则

在国外,检察官的客观公正义务是以实体真实主义和职权主义为基本原理的德国法学的产物。其起源于19世纪后期德国的刑事诉讼法,随后在欧洲大陆和亚洲一些大陆法系国家的法律中也得到了体现。客观公正原则实质上是客观性原则和公正原则的结合,因而具有两个方面的基本内容。在当代中国,客观公正原则的法理基础和法律依据则主要有四个方面。     

公民权益保障建设研究

城市化进程的急速推进,打破了传统社会的利益格局,社会大转型引发了众多的社会问题,导致涉诉信访问题层出不穷。研究和解决公民合理的利益诉求表达、协调各方利益、畅通公民权益保障渠道建设尤为重要。本文从大连地区社会不稳定因素产生的原因入手,针对当前公民权益保障中存在的问题提出领导干部应提高认识,转变观念,树立公民权利至上理念,多方拓展保障公民合法权益的途径,使维权维稳工作健康有序。     

论司法公正与司法高效的宪政基础

司法公正和司法高效是中国司法体制改革追求的目标 ,其宪政基础是司法独立 ,而问题的关键则是正确认识党的领导与司法独立的关系 ,正确处理人民代表大会的监督和司法独立的关系。     

现代诉讼的法理性透视

现代社会的诉讼制度设计根据社会冲突的性质可主要划分为三种类型。即民事诉讼制度、刑事诉讼制度和行政诉讼制度。这三大诉讼在程序设计上有着共通的法理 ,即公正与衡平。文章从程序结构法理以及程序运作法理这两个方面对此进行了论述。随后 ,本文通过对诉讼中引入“合意机制”的思考 ,对现代诉讼的价值导向进行了反思 ,指出弘扬个体自治的深远意义。     

A case study of interpreter-mediated witness statement: police interpreting in South Korea

Interpreters play an important role in police interviewing witnesses from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. In the cases where interpreters lack professional attributes such as interpreting competence and impartiality, it is very likely that the interpreted evidence and statement will not be a faithful reproduction of original utterances. If attention is not paid to possible alterations by interpreters to the original utterances of the witness and duty of care is lacking in the procedure of obtaining statement from witnesses through such interpreters, the official legal record may not be an accurate one. Drawing on the data of a video-recorded interpreter-mediated police interview in South Korea, this paper examines issues arising from the lack of understanding of the role of interpreters, which may have implications for criminal proceedings. The findings indicate that in addition to interpreter training, more efficient police training in the adoption of best practice guidelines in interviewing through interpreters is required.     

论侦查效益价值

在侦查资源稀缺、犯罪形势 日益严重以及保障人权呼声不断高涨 的今天,要求侦查活动利用和科学地 配置有限的侦查资源,最大程度地实 现侦查的社会效益和经济效益。这既 是侦查效益的品性,又是侦查效益价 值的本质追求。因此从价值层面对侦 查效益进行分析,以解决侦查理论和 实践中出现的效益问题,具有重要的 理论和现实意义。     

论证券信息披露法律制度的理论依据

针对现代证券市场的核心内容——证券信息披露法律制度进行理性分析,认为公平是各国制定证券法的法理基础、市场失灵是证券信息披露制度客观存在的经济理论依据。     

REPRESENTATION DISPARITIES AND IMPARTIALITY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF PARTY PERCEPTION OF FEAR,PREPARATION, AND SATISFACTION IN DIVORCE MEDIATION WHEN ONLY ONE PARTY HAS COUNSEL

While other authors have regarded both the presence and the absence of attorneys in family law mediation as cause for concern, little attention has been given to the questions raised when one party is represented and the other is pro se. This article presents data on mediating parties' premediation concerns, fears, and feelings of preparedness, as well as their postmediation satisfaction with the mediation process. The mediating parties are grouped based on each couple's representation status, for example, both represented by attorneys, both pro se, or one attorney‐represented party and one pro se party (mixed representation cases). The data show that mixed representation cases are the most likely to report concern, fear, and unpreparedness. Mixed‐representation cases also reported the lowest levels of satisfaction after the mediation. Some implications for mediation practice are discussed, as are suggestions for future research.     

律师与程序公正

真正成功的优秀的辩护律师心中追求的不是个案中可能有罪的人被判无罪这种结果的出现 ,他追求的是他心中的梦 ,他的职业的最高理念———程序公正的实现。