西乡县城关派出所荣获“全国公安机关执法示范单位”称号

汉中市西乡县公安局城关派出所荣获＂全国公安机关执法示范单位＂称号。这是国家公安部近年来首次组织的此项评选,该所是汉中市唯一一个获此殊荣的基层公安派出所。近年来,该所紧紧围绕＂信息化建设、执法规范化建设、和谐警民关系建设＂三项目标,不断强化执法监督,全面提升执法能力,执法规范化建设取得显著成效,为该县率先突破发展,和谐社...     

磨砺正义之剑——长治市公安局郊区分局执法规范化建设侧记

今年以来,山西省长治市公安局郊区分局以增强依法履职能力为主线,以解决执法突出问题为切入点,以推行精细化执法、加强执法监督、提高执法服务水平为抓手,加快执法规范化建设,有效遏制了恶性执法问题和重大执法过错的发生,维护了社会和谐稳定,成为长治市公安执法规范化建设的＂领头雁＂。     

钓鱼执法拷问行政执法程序

上海市交通执法大队＂钓鱼执法＂引起社会的广泛关注。其核心本质在于执法人员违反执法程序,违背法制观念,其也反映出我国行政执法现状,因此加强行政执法程序建设势在必行。本文正是从钓鱼执法违背执法程序出发指出加强行政执法程序建设,规范执法路径,体现法治国家的应然本质。     

朔州市公安局朔城分局执法规范化建设工作掠影

2010年以来,朔州市公安局朔城分局党委以执法规范化标杆单位建设为契机,把执法规范化建设作为＂三项建设＂的核心和公安工作的＂牛鼻子工程＂来抓,助推各项公安工作和队伍建设的快速健康发展，为保障朔城区转型跨越发展中心工作、维护大局稳定做出了积极的贡献。     

加强队伍作风建设 提高执法公信力

湖南省岳阳县人民检察院以加强检察队伍作风建设为抓手,以实现＂阳光执法,科学发展＂为目标,通过创建学习型检察院提高队伍素质,公开承诺阳光执法,深化文明创建活动以树立执法形象,从而不断提高检察机关执法公信力。     

内化于心、外践于行 实现理念向行动的自觉转化

用理性、平和、文明、规范的执法理念指导检察工作,就要做到＂四个强化＂,实现＂四个统一＂。教育检察干警牢固树立和自觉践行正确的执法观,进一步增强检察执法公信力和提升检察形象,就必须加强队伍素质建设,完善机制保障和监督制约,实现＂理性、平和、文明、规范＂的执法观由理念向行动的自觉转化。一、做到＂四个强化＂,实现＂四个统一＂理性、平和、文明、规范的执法理念的提出,对新形势下检察机关执法办案提出了更为明确、     

全力打造安全畅通的交通环境——记延安市富县公安局交通警察大队

2011年,富县公安局交警大队以＂三项重点工作＂和＂三项建设＂为载体,以队伍建设为根本,以事故预防为第一要务,以缓堵保畅为第一要求,紧紧抓住社会矛盾化解、社会管理创新、公正廉洁执法＂三项重点工作＂,全面推进信息化、执法规范化、和谐警民关系＂三项建设＂,进一步强化道路交通安全源头管理、通行管理、宜传教育＂三项措施＂     

浅析说理式劳教执法的基本内涵及实践路径

在新的形势、新的任务面前,如何进一步加强劳教工作执法规范化建设的问题,是我们当前的重要工作任务之一。笔者认为,积极倡导和大力推进说理式执法,是加强劳教工作执法规范化建设的一个重要载体和切入口。一、说理式执法的基本内涵分析＂说理＂一词,在《现代汉语词典》中,有两层含义,一是说明道理,如＂咱们找他说理去＂;二是讲理,不蛮横,     

强化对执法办案活动监督问题研究

执法办案是推进检察机关惩治和预防腐败体系建设的必然要求、是推进高素质检察队伍建设的必然要求,是检察机关法律监督职能的核心工作。检察机关执法办案活动的好坏则直接反映着检察机关＂立检为公,执法为民＂的形象,具体体现着检察工作＂强化法律监督,维护公平正义＂的效果。     

壶关县住建局依法行政引领城乡建设

近年来,山西省壶关县先后被授予＂国家卫生县城＂、＂国家文明县城＂、＂国家园林县城＂等称号,城市规划管理、建筑工程质量安全管理、建筑市场执法、有形市场建设等各项行政执法工作多次受到省、市、县表彰。壶关县住房保障和城乡建设管理局坚持以科学发展观为指导,强化执法领导,营造法治环境,坚持依法行政,打击违法建设,     

法治视野下的公安行政程序问题研究

我国公安机关办理治安案件存在的问题大多集中在程序上,重实体,轻程序的执法习惯在法治呼声高涨的社会中很容易制造社会矛盾。关注和研究公安行政执法程序问题,解析公安行政执法程序执行上的困难,从加强行政执法程序性训练,完善法律规制以及发挥调解、听证等程序的法律价值等几方面着手,积极回应社会对公安行政执法的程序法治要求。     

论盘查

作为一种介于行政警察和司法警察职能之间、介于刑事侦查程序与行政调查程序之间、也介于警察法与刑事诉讼法之间的、具有双重属性的警察行为,盘查是警察机关对于可疑人员和可疑场所临时进行拦阻、盘问、检视、检查的行为。由于在盘查过程中,一些强制性手段的运用将给公民基本权利造成不可避免的干预,因此,对盘查从启动到执行必须实行严格的程序控制,同时还应给权利受到违法盘查侵犯的当事人提供程序救济。     

Perceived police legitimacy: investigating its association with college-based informal social controls

Research has found that when private citizens view law enforcement as legitimate authority figures, they are more likely to obey laws and voluntarily comply with police demands. Although procedural justice has shown to be an important predictor of perceived police legitimacy, a recent line of studies has found other significant correlates of this outcome, including media exposure, ethnic identity and strain. To date, however, few studies have explored the role collegiate-based informal social controls play in predicting law enforcement legitimacy evaluations. Using questionnaire data from a convenience sample of college students, linear regression equations were estimated to explore whether Hirschi's four social bond measures predict the obligation to obey and trust in police constructs of police legitimacy. Across both models and even after controlling for procedural justice, respondent beliefs were positively correlated with these measures. Theoretical and policy implications are discussed.     

The influence of strain on law enforcement legitimacy evaluations

Purpose

While law enforcement officers have the state-sanctioned authority to use force as a way to ensure citizen obedience with the law, research has found that when private citizens evaluate the police as legitimate, they are more likely to comply with legal demands and cooperate with the police. Although procedural justice has shown to be a highly significant predictor of perceived police legitimacy, research has found other correlates of this outcome, including ethnic identity, low self-control and structural economic disadvantage. To date, no study has explored whether strain influences perceptions of the legitimacy of law enforcement.

Methods

A series of linear regression equations was estimated using survey data collected from a convenience sample of college students to determine the effect of strain on perceived police legitimacy.

Results

Even after controlling for procedural justice, strain exerted a negative and statistically significant influence on law enforcement legitimacy evaluations.

Conclusions

Police officers are encouraged to interact with citizens in procedurally just manners and to also consider people's strain levels when enforcing the law.     

“警察人性化执法”刍议

警察人性化执法,是指警察在执法过程中,在依法保障当事人合法权益的前提下,依照法定的职权和法定的程序,改变执法观念和执法方式,以人为本,实现执法公正的一项专门活动。在警察人性化执法中,严格执法是前提,依法保障当事人的合法权益(包括警察自身的合法权益)是核心内容,人文关怀是方式,实现执法公正是终极目标。而"懦弱执法"、"人情执法"、"不平等执法"和"首次不罚"的执法都不是警察的人性化执法。警察人性化执法实现的途径主要有三:一是完善公安法律制度;二是提高人民警察自身的素质;三是加强监督,从严治警。     

论法治理性视野下警察执法和谐的构建

以法治理性的价值判断和价值选择审视和优化警察执法环境,是坚持以人为本、以自由秩序原则和民主法治精神构建警察执法和谐的关键所在。以自由秩序原则和民主法治精神构建警察执法和谐是法治理性的基本要求;尊重和保障人权是警察执法和谐的真谛;体现法治理性的宽容精神是警察执法和谐的需要。警察执法和谐呼唤体现法治理性的积极守法精神。培养积极守法精神对于促进公民理性守法,警察理性执法,实现警察执法效益的最大化以及构建和谐社会都具有重要意义。     

Hostage negotiation in Costa Rica

This article compares legal and procedural constraints that operate on United States and Costa Rican hostage negotiations. In an effort to better understand the Costa Rican police system, comparisons are drawn between United States law enforcement agencies, United States military services and the Costa Rican police system. The introductory material lays the foundation for a discussion of hostage negotiation as it is practiced in Costa Rica prior to and after hostage negotiation training.     

略论警察执法服务质量管理

警察执法服务质量管理是一个十分重要的理论问题。公共服务职能是警察的基本职能之一。警察权力的亲和性决定了警察执法必须为国家的安全、发展和富强服务,为人民大众的和睦、富裕和幸福服务。当前,警察执法存在着诸多问题,构建以服务公众为导向的警察执法服务质量管理系统势在必行。     

公安机关贯彻新刑事诉讼法中遇到的问题研究

2013年1月1日开始实施的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》(以下简称新刑诉法)修改的内容几乎涵盖了全部的诉讼制度,对公安机关执法产生了重大影响。2014年广东省警察协会成立了调研组,就公安机关贯彻落实新刑诉一年多来遇到的问题进行深入调研,主要存在犯罪嫌疑人翻供拒供案例明显增加,审讯工作难度增大;证据意识薄弱,执法办案不规范;警察难以适应出庭作证的要求,素质有待提高;涉案财物管理薄弱,物证保存困难;精神病人犯罪现象突出,强制措施难以落实;徐辉案效应不容忽视,存在翻案压力等问题,且成因也较为复杂。公安机关必须切实提高思想认识,积极主动适应,不断提高办案工作规范化,进一步推进新刑诉法的实施。     

Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counterterrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans

This study considers the circumstances under which members of the Muslim American community voluntarily cooperate with police efforts to combat terrorism. Cooperation is defined to include both a general receptivity toward helping the police in antiterror work and the specific willingness to alert police to terror‐related risks in a community. We compare two perspectives on why people cooperate with law enforcement, both developed with reference to general policing, in the context of antiterror policing and specifically among members of the Muslim American community. The first is instrumental. It suggests that people cooperate because they see tangible benefits that outweigh any costs. The second perspective is normative. It posits that people respond to their belief that police are a legitimate authority. On this view we link legitimacy to the fairness and procedural justice of police behavior. Data from a study involving interviews with Muslim Americans in New York City between March and June 2009 strongly support the normative model by finding that the procedural justice of police activities is the primary factor shaping legitimacy and cooperation with the police.