读《史记·货殖列传》札记三篇

札记一<史记·货殖列传>和<汉书·货殖传>均有子贡传,唯不尽同.前者是表彰货殖家之贤而富者,后者意在尊孔,所以对子贡传加以更改.札记二<史记·货殖列传>中"椎埋"一词凡两见,其一是指货殖家"取与以时"牟利致富,与椎埋不相干,当为"推移"二字之误.札记三<史记·货殖列传>中"权利"一词在汉朝是盐铁的同义语.     

《史记》与《儒林外史》:叙事模式的承传与重构

中国古代小说的产生是史传分流的结果。尽管小说已经形成自己的体制与特点,但对史传的师承却不绝如缕。本文拟就《史记》与《儒林外史》在结构模式上的承传与重构做一阐述。     

《史记》中的人才思想及其当代启示

《史记》全面记载了西汉以前中国古代社会政治、经济、军事、哲学等多方面丰富的知识,恢弘壮阔,博大精深,其中的人才思想对社会主义建设非常具有启示价值。在当今人才辈出,人才竞争最为激烈和人才推动科学发展的时代,各级领导干部必须切实担当"伯乐"之职,察人不惑于利诱,识才不拘于偏爱,荐才不论于亲疏,选才不惧于压力,用才不囿于私念,真正做到不偏不倚识人才,唯才是举荐人才,不拘一格用人才。     

Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006: the implications for employers in educational settings

Vetting those who work with children and vulnerable adults is an emotive topic and one which can prove a challenging area for employers. The legitimate interest that parents, carers and employers have in screening those charged with the care of others can be in direct conflict with the most fundamental principles of economic freedom and employees’ human rights. The desire to balance these conflicting objectives is at the heart of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, which introduces what is being heralded as the most inclusive and comprehensive vetting and barring system to date. The changes dramatically widen the scope of workers who are subject to vetting and barring processes, covering employees, volunteers and contractors in the education, care and health industries, and affecting some 11.3 million people in the UK. This new scheme is of particular relevance and importance to schools and other educational institutions, who will be directly affected by the changes. This article will examine the practical employment implications of the new regime and the new obligations that the Vetting and Barring Scheme creates for both employers and employees.     

医疗纠纷病历资料保全存在问题与对策

《侵权责任法》第六十一条第二款规定，患者要求查阅、复制病历资料的，医疗机构应当提供。第五十八条规定，医疗机构隐匿或者拒绝提供与纠纷有关的病历资料的，人民法院推定医疗机构有过错。病历资料作为医疗损害案件诉讼的核心证据，对病历资料保全自然就成为医患双方诉前关注的焦点问题。由于现行法律法规对病历资料规定的不一致，导致医患双方对病历资料的范围、保全的方式方法、封存病历资料期限、保全病历资料主体等诸多问题认识极不一致，争议颇多。造成医患双方在发生医疗纠纷的基础上进而引发次生纠纷，导致医患矛盾进一步加深，不利于纠纷的及时解决。笔者不揣简陋，试对病历资料保全环节中存在的问题及对相关问题提出规制建议，希望同仁不吝赐教。     

试论《道路交通安全法》第一百一十四条存在的立法缺陷及其完善

《道路交通安全法》第114条有悖于《行政处罚法》对公正的价值追求;违背《行政处罚法》所倡导的处罚与教育相结合原则;在权力和权利这对行政法所关注的主要矛盾的价值取向上与现代法治对依法行政的基本要求不相适应。《道路交通安全法》第114条的内容可以作如后调整:交通技术监控记录资料可以作为公安交通管理部门进行处罚的证据;对有记录资料且能够确定驾驶人的,应当即时依法予以处罚;对有记录资料但不能确定驾驶人的,公安机关交通管理部门应当按《行政处罚法》所规定的一般程序查明违法事实,即时予以处罚。     

Idle musical community: Dischord Records and anarchic DIY practice

Originally formed in 1980 to document the Teen Idle’s Minor Disturbance EP, Dischord Records has continued to document and support the local Washington, DC, hardcore punk music scene for over three decades through an anarchic Do-It-Yourself (DIY) ethic. Dischord’s DIY ethic affords a manner of music documentation, in contrast to production, and community formation that reconfigures the space of dominant commercial production and exchange. Dischord’s business practices, such as forming agreements with bands via handshake instead of legal contract, allow the label to resist consumerism and exploitation of both artists and audiences while fostering a creative space, where profit does not dictate the sound of the music or produce a commodified musical product. Ultimately, Dischord’s political potential is in its ethics to the extent that anarchic DIY practice constitutes a sort of inoperative community of circulation rather than production and profit. The implications of these practices relate to the ways in which music constitutes social and communal relations and its radical possibility of reconfiguring a space outside of commercial exchanges, whether in the political sphere or in the digital realm.     

《史记》整理平议

对古籍新整理本特别是公认的典范之作进行平议，将有助于进一步提高古籍整理出版的质量。中华书局校点本《史记》是人们学习和开展《史记》研究工作最常用的权威本，并被认为是古籍整理方面成绩优异的代表作之一。实际上，校点本仅正部分就新生字差错80余处，径自改移增删、脱漏校改符号等古籍整理失范之处不少，吸收学术成果不足，漏校、误校问题亦多。随着当代学术研究的深入，对《史记》有重加整理的必要。     

拓展历史编纂学研究之方法论思考

中国历史编纂学是正在建设的一门学科。拓展这一领域的研究,关键所在是不能将之视为单纯的技术问题,而亟须加强对其哲理层面的思考,深入发掘史学名著的成就,认真总结中国历史编纂学的优良传统和人文精神。当前尤应深入探索以下四项有效的研究途径:第一,贯彻发展观点,将创始时期的特征与以后的纵向发展联系起来考察;第二,确立整体观念,深入总结史学名著所蕴涵的深邃哲理与高度审美价值;第三,贯彻“历史主义”的观点和方法,克服偏颇之见;第四,运用比较研究方法,阐释传统史学精华在历史变局面前所具有的应变力。     

刑事证据视野中的盘查记录

盘查记录有《当场盘问、检查笔录》和《挡获经过（说明）》两种形式,它们在制作主体、形成时间空间、证明内容等方面具有不同特点,之所以如此,源于不同的警务机制。盘查记录的诉讼证据资格不应有任何疑问,这是因为在＂违法—犯罪二元追诉机制＂下,刑事立案前的查缉活动由负责日常警务的警察依法进行,由此获得的证据必然具有合法性。在证明作用方面,盘查记录因其证明内容的综合性、直接性和不可替代性,从而具备了很强的诉讼推进能力。从立法完善角度,应当统一盘查记录的形式,规范其制作方式和记载内容,明确盘查记录的诉讼证据地位。