陈旧性骨骼DNA提取方法的探索

目的探索陈旧性骨骼DNA的提取方法。方法收集4~15年陈旧骨骼样本,去除表面污染物,经脱钙、裂解提取各样本DNA,使用QIAquickPCR Purification试剂盒进行纯化,检测DNA纯度和浓度,应用Power PlexFusion荧光标记复合扩增系统进行扩增,AB-3500型遗传分析仪检测STR分型。结果 15例陈旧性骨骼经提取、纯化,提取的DNA模板浓度较高,在42.9~176.4ng/μL之间,A260/A280值较稳定,在1.06~1.40之间;所有样本均获得完整STR分型。结论该方法简便快速,提取效果好,能够适用于法医学实际检案。     

陈旧骨骼DNA提取

目的寻找从陈旧骨骼中提取DNA的有效方法。方法运用传统的有机法结合Microcon100纯化柱提取骨骼DNA。结果用常规荧光标记复合STR基因分型法可对提取到的陈旧骨骼DNA进行成功分析。结论有机法结合Micrcon100纯化柱提取陈旧骨骼DNA法可有效应用于实际检案。     

烧骨DNA检验技术的研究

目的解决陈旧性骨骼和烧骨DNA检验难题。方法研究建立了CTAB法裂解提取DNA,再用磁珠纯化得到的DNA提取液进行STR复合扩增检验。结果实验结果及实际检案显示研究所建立的骨DNA提取方法能较好地去除DNA扩增抑制物,得到高质量的DNA模板。结论本研究所建立的烧骨DNA检验方法其识别率为10×10-12,达到个人同一认定的目的,在解决实际工作中杀人焚尸案、火灾、爆炸等恶性案件和事故中有重要的作用。     

联合运用CTAB与磁珠提取陈旧骨骼DNA

<正> 用Chelex-100法或酚-氯仿法提取骨骼DNA,一般采用PK消化。该法虽对比较新鲜且有软骨组织存在的骨骼DNA提取效果较好,但对陈旧性骨骼DNA提取,难以达到理想效果。有人将CTAB(cetytrimethylammonium bromide,十六烷基三甲基溴化胺)用于陈旧性骨骼DNA提取,并采用纯化柱对DNA提取液进行浓缩纯化。由于其检验步骤相对烦琐,产物回收率受到限制。本文作者用CTAB裂解     

利用AutoMate Express~(TM)系统提取陈旧性骨骼DNA

目的建立利用AutoMate Express~(TM)系统提取陈旧性骨骼DNA的方法。方法将骨骼用冷冻研磨机研磨成骨粉,经AutoMate Express~(TM)系统提取后,用Identifiler~Plus、MiniFiler~(TM)试剂盒扩增分型。结果10例保存在不同环境中、死亡时间在10~20年的骨骼样本利用AutoMate Express~(TM)系统3 h内完成DNA提取,有8例获得完整STR分型。结论 AutoMate Express~(TM)系统能快速、高效地提取陈旧性骨骼DNA,可应用于法医实际案件检验。     

陈旧骨骼DNA提取及性别鉴定

用本室建立的方法对3～15年的陈旧骨骼进行DNA提取，并用X、Y同源引物扩增AInelogenin基因X、Y特异性片段，所有检材均得出正确结论，表明该方法快速、灵敏、可靠，适用于陈旧骨骼性别鉴定。     

陈旧骨骼的核DNA检验

在发达国家，对无名尸骨进行个人识别时，通常的方法是比较骨骼与死者生前的身体特征或医疗记录[1]，但在发展中国家，由于。医疗记录往往不甚完备，这种方法较难以实施。此外，如果对已埋葬数十年的尸骨进行鉴定，则更需要依靠其他技术方法。运用PCR技术进行DNA检验是解决这种难题的途径之一。陈旧骨骼的DNA降解严重，从中提取的核DNA一般小于1000bp[2]，为此，进行PCR分析时宜选择扩增片段较短的基因位点。在本文中，作者报道了一种可靠的用于陈旧骨胳DNA提取、扩增和基因分型的方法。材料和方法一、样本取长骨、椎骨作为实验检材…     

自动荧光分析法检验陈旧骨骼和牙齿的vWA和LPL位点

为鉴定陈旧骨骼和牙齿的尸源 ,对DNA的提取方法进行了研究,并建立了vWA和LPL位点的自动荧光分析技术,该法简便、快速、有效、可对存放2、3、4、7年的陈旧骨骼和牙齿成功地进行检验,在检验中能直接确定样品的等位基因     

一种改良Chelex地方法提取血痕DNA

对于新鲜或量足的血痕,采用文献报道的Chelex-100直接处理提取DNA,一般都能获得满意结果,但在日常检案过程中,陈旧而量少的血痕检材经常遇到,而且载体可能有泥沙、色素或吸附力强等PCR扩增抑制物的存在.这类检材DNA采用普通的Chelex-100快速提取法,有时很难奏效.针对以上问题,本文结合两例检案,对血痕DNA的Chelex-100快速提取法进行了一些改良,显著提高了检出率,使检案成功,报告如下:1 材料与方法1.1 材料:取自本实验室检验的两案例中的22份血痕.     

MagAttract(R)M48试剂盒在案例骨骼检验中的应用

陈旧性骨骼DNA检验的关键环节之一是模板DNA的提取及纯化,本文采用MagAttract(R)M48 DNAManual试剂盒(QIAGEN公司,简称M48试剂盒)对陈旧降解骨骼样本进行检验,结果如下.     

A simple and efficient method for extracting DNA from old and burned bone

It has been a challenge to extract DNA from bones previously soaked in water, burned, or buried for a long time, due to the reduced quality and quantity of DNA in the bone samples. The dramatic degradation of the DNA and the presence of PCR inhibitors in the collagen significantly complicate the process of DNA identification in dated and charred bones. In this article, we present a novel strategy to obtain DNA from bones based on the use of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) lysis buffer and isoamyl alcohol-chloroform extraction with subsequent DNA purification using the DNA IQ System, or alternatively the QIAquick system. When applied to bones soaked, burned or buried for up to nine years, this method increases the purity and yield of DNA with respect to the traditional phenol-chloroform method and significantly improves multiplex STR genotyping using fluorescence-based methods. The results of this research will assist forensic scientists in the identification of DNA from victims whose bodies underwent significant trauma or burning, precluding the utilization of traditional forensic DNA identification techniques.     

Highly efficient and automated extraction of DNA from human remains using a modified EZ1 protocol

Bones and teeth often represent the only sources of DNA available for identifying human remains. DNA in bones and teeth is generally better preserved than that in soft tissues because of the presence of hard connective tissue with a high level of calcium. Because of the extensive mineralisation, the choice of an efficient DNA extraction procedure is important to minimise the sampling of a high level of minerals and to remove polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitors. Some protocols are available for DNA extraction from bones and teeth as part of the Qiagen EZ1 DNA Investigator Kit using the EZ1 Advanced XL automated purification platform. To improve the efficiency of DNA extraction from skeletal remains, the present study focuses on a modification to these already available protocols. In this study, different bones and teeth collected between 1 and 50 years after death were subjected to DNA extraction using the standard EZ1 protocol, a supplementary protocol, and a modified protocol. The modified approach included a decalcification step, whereas the Qiagen protocols worked directly on non-decalcified powder. In all three procedures, 150 mg samples were used for DNA extraction. We evaluated the quantity of DNA recovered from samples, the presence of any PCR inhibitors co-extracted, the level of DNA degradation, the quality of short tandem repeat (STR) profiles, and the reproducibility of the modified procedure. When compared with the other protocols, the modified protocol resulted in the best recovery of DNA that was free of PCR inhibitors. Additionally, the STR profiles were reliable and of high quality. In our opinion, the decalcification step increases DNA recovery by softening tissues, which allows lysis solutions to act more effectively. Furthermore, the use of two lysis solutions and the variation added to the EZ1 purification step allow for DNA recovery with quality and quantity superior to those of the previously available Qiagen-based protocols. These findings may be helpful solutions to the problems commonly encountered when dealing with difficult samples, such as bones and teeth.

Key points

• Bones and teeth often represent the only sources of DNA for identifying human remains.
• The choice of an efficient DNA extraction procedure is important for maximizing DNA recovery and removing PCR inhibitors.
• This study focuses on modifications to the previously available Qiagen-based protocols.
• The modified protocol enabled the best recovery of DNA, and both quality and quantity were superior to those of the previously available Qiagen-based protocols.
• The STR profiles obtained from samples extracted using the modified protocol were reliable and of high quality.

     

2种陈旧骨骼、牙齿DNA纯化方法的比较

目的比较有机法+QIAquick纯化法和DNA IQ磁珠法对陈旧骨骼和牙齿DNA的纯化效果。方法选择10份陈旧骨骼和12份牙齿样本,进行消化后分别采用有机法+QIAquick纯化法和DNA IQ磁珠法进行提取纯化,进行DNA定量后用SinofilerTM试剂盒进行检测。结果 2种方法纯化的骨骼、牙齿DNA的IPC CT值无显著差异。有机法+QIAquick纯化法纯化的骨骼、牙齿DNA平均浓度分别为0.180ng/μL±0.068ng/μL和0.132ng/μL±0.027ng/μL,所有样品均获得全部基因分型。DNA IQ磁珠法纯化的DNA平均浓度分别为0.038ng/μL±0.028ng/μL和0.036ng/μL±0.007ng/μL,有5份骨骼和6份牙齿样本仅获得部分基因分型或未能分型。结论有机法+QIAquick纯化法对陈旧骨骼、牙齿DNA的纯化效果优于DNA IQ磁珠法。     

A Simple and Efficient Method of Extracting DNA from Aged Bones and Teeth

DNA is often difficult to extract from old bones and teeth due to low levels of DNA and high levels of degradation. This study established a simple yet efficient method for extracting DNA from 20 aged bones and teeth (approximately 60 years old). Based on the concentration and STR typing results, the new method of DNA extraction (OM) developed in this study was compared with the PrepFiler? BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kit (BM). The total amount of DNA extracted using the OM method was not significantly different from that extracted using the commercial kit (p > 0.05). However, the number of STR loci detected was significantly higher in the samples processed using the OM method than using the BM method (p < 0.05). This study aimed to establish a DNA extraction method for aged bones and teeth to improve the detection rate of STR typing and reduce costs compared to the BM technique.     

两种骨骼及牙齿纯化方法的比较分析

目的比较硅珠法和硅胶膜法对骨骼和牙齿的纯化效果。方法选择6根骨骼和8颗牙齿,进行消化后分别采用硅珠法与硅胶膜法进行纯化,用Global Filer~(?)试剂盒进行扩增检测,通过比较检出率和峰高来评价这两种方法。结果两种纯化方法均成功检测出了骨骼和牙齿的STR分型。同一样本中,相同基因座上两种方法检出的等位基因分型结果完全一致。两种方法处理得到的平均峰高差异无统计学意义。结论硅胶膜法在骨骼及牙齿的纯化中能满足实际常规检案的要求,且和硅珠法无明显差异,但在操作上更具优势,缺点是成本较高,在实际工作中可以选择使用。     

Extraction of human DNA for PCR from chewed residues of betel quid using a novel "PVP/CTAB" method

Residues of chewed betel quid (BQ) are often found on crime scenes in Taiwan and possibly some of the Southeast Asian countries. Although these residues are important biological evidences relating to the suspects, the forensic analysis of BQ evidence has been hindered by failures in extraction of human DNA for PCR analysis. Therefore, it is a prerequisite for relevant forensic casework to establish a reliable method for extracting DNA from chewed BQ residues. Three conventional methods (salt/chloroform, 5% Chelex-100 resin, and QIAamp) were first tested for extraction of human DNA from 33 mock BQ samples, which had been stored for less than two months, and 50 four-year-old forensic BQ samples. PCR amplifications from the HLA-DQA1&PM and the STR loci were then used to test the quality of the extracted DNA. For the mock samples, three observations were made. First, PCR amplification of DNA extracted by using these conventional methods had low success rate. Second, the addition of extra Taq DNA polymerase could compensate the lost enzyme activities due to putative inhibitors and, thus, increase the yield. Third, using the Centricon-100 column to remove putative inhibitors substantially improved the efficiency of PCR. However, for the four-year-old forensic BQ samples, none of the attempts for PCR were successful. In order to solve the problem in PCR analysis of DNA from old BQ samples, we developed a DNA extraction method based on the use of polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), which bind to two common classes of PCR inhibitors in plants, polyphenols, and polysaccharides, respectively. The result showed that this "PVP/CTAB" method is completely successful for the mock BQ samples, and 92% (46 out of 50) successful for the four-year-old forensic BQ samples. To our best knowledge, this is the first report of a reliable method for the extraction of human DNA for PCR from chewed BQ residues. This method should provide a useful means for forensic identification in countries where betel chewing is common.     

DNA提取方法和PCR循环次数对STR扩增成功率的影响

目的探讨常见载体上的微量血痕DNA的提取方法、PCR循环次数对STR扩增成功率的影响。方法分别应用Chelex-100法及Chelex-100结合纯化法对8种载体上不同大小的血痕样本进行DNA提取,并采用28次、30次及34次PCR循环进行STR扩增,分别观察其扩增成功率。结果经28次、30次及34次PCR循环,Chelex-100法提取DNA后的STR扩增成功率分别为0.2917,0.3333,0.4583,Chelex-100结合纯化法的STR扩增成功率分别为0.3750,0.4583,0.8750。结论用Chelex-100结合纯化法提取DNA,用34次循环扩增可提高STR基因座的检测成功率。     

Recovery of DNA from bone without demineralization

This study assessed the performance of five different DNA extraction methods for the recovery of DNA from bone: ChargeSwitch® gDNA Plant Kit, DNA IQ™ System Kit, DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit, PrepFiler® BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kit and phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol. DNA was extracted from pig rib and femur bones that was fresh, had undergone surface decomposition for three months, and had undergone surface decomposition for one year. Extracted DNA was analyzed using real-time PCR and amplification of an in-house PCR multiplex that assessed the quality and quantity of DNA and for the presence of inhibitors. The phenol-chloroform-based method consistently yielded the highest amounts of DNA and DNA IQ the lowest; however, all methods produced relatively high yields of DNA from both pig rib and femur samples that could be amplified without any detected inhibition. The data demonstrate that with reasonable quality bone samples any of the tested methods can isolate DNA that can be successfully analyzed. The effective use of internal PCR controls is also demonstrated.     

Full STR profile of a 67-year-old bone found in a fresh water lake

DNA extraction from and DNA typing of fresh water-exposed aged bone specimens poses a challenging task and is not very well examined. This study presents a new method to extract typable DNA from such problematic bone specimens. The procedure comprises low-heat drilling and cryogrinding, mild lysis conditions, and silica-column-based DNA cleaning. DNA quantity is assessed by quantitative PCR prior to short tandem repeat (STR) amplification. The procedure was employed with a 67-year-old tibia bone fragment recovered from a fresh water lake and succeeded to produce a full STR profile using the MPX-SP1 and MPX-SP2 mini-STR kits and a partial profile with 12 successfully amplified STRs using the Identifiler STR kit. The new method for the extraction of DNA from aged fresh water-exposed bone specimens presented herein was successfully applied to prepare DNA of sufficient quality and quantity to generate a full STR profile.