联合运用CTAB与磁珠提取陈旧骨骼DNA

<正> 用Chelex-100法或酚-氯仿法提取骨骼DNA,一般采用PK消化。该法虽对比较新鲜且有软骨组织存在的骨骼DNA提取效果较好,但对陈旧性骨骼DNA提取,难以达到理想效果。有人将CTAB(cetytrimethylammonium bromide,十六烷基三甲基溴化胺)用于陈旧性骨骼DNA提取,并采用纯化柱对DNA提取液进行浓缩纯化。由于其检验步骤相对烦琐,产物回收率受到限制。本文作者用CTAB裂解     

2种陈旧骨骼、牙齿DNA纯化方法的比较

目的比较有机法+QIAquick纯化法和DNA IQ磁珠法对陈旧骨骼和牙齿DNA的纯化效果。方法选择10份陈旧骨骼和12份牙齿样本,进行消化后分别采用有机法+QIAquick纯化法和DNA IQ磁珠法进行提取纯化,进行DNA定量后用SinofilerTM试剂盒进行检测。结果 2种方法纯化的骨骼、牙齿DNA的IPC CT值无显著差异。有机法+QIAquick纯化法纯化的骨骼、牙齿DNA平均浓度分别为0.180ng/μL±0.068ng/μL和0.132ng/μL±0.027ng/μL,所有样品均获得全部基因分型。DNA IQ磁珠法纯化的DNA平均浓度分别为0.038ng/μL±0.028ng/μL和0.036ng/μL±0.007ng/μL,有5份骨骼和6份牙齿样本仅获得部分基因分型或未能分型。结论有机法+QIAquick纯化法对陈旧骨骼、牙齿DNA的纯化效果优于DNA IQ磁珠法。     

陈旧骨骼DNA检验2例

对高度腐败及白骨化的尸体,骨骼是进行DNA检验的唯一检材。由于骨骼的特殊组织结构及环境因素的影响,使骨骼DNA提取较一般的组织困难。本文作者运用传统的有机法结合Microcon100纯化柱提取骨骼DNA,对2例陈旧骨骼DNA进行检验,现报道如下。1简要案情例12004年8月某河边发现一白骨化的尸骨,破案证实系2001年5月失踪的出租车司机陈某。取肱骨1根进行DNA检验。例22005年6月某水库内发现部分碎尸块,破案证实系半年前失踪的郭某。取股骨1根进行DNA检验。2DNA检验骨骼处理用手术刀片刮净骨骼表面的污垢,蒸馏水冲洗干净后晾干,在紫外灯下照…     

3种方法联合运用提取人体脱落上皮细胞DNA

目的寻求提高法医物证检验中附有人体脱落细胞载体检材的DNA检出率的方法。方法根据案件检材的具体条件．选择3种提取方法即Chelex-100法、Chelex-100联合有机法和Chelex-100联合磁珠法。结果采用了分步提取DNA法,可充分、有效地提取微量DNA,提高了人体脱落上皮细胞有效DNA的检出率。结论根据第一步提取方法的检测结果,来调整下一步的提取策略,如是否加以纯化浓缩,可增加人体脱落上皮细胞有效DNA的检出率。     

陈旧性骨骼DNA提取技术的研究

对陈旧性骨骼建立一个高回收率并能除去 PCR 反应抑制物的提取 DNA 的方法。采用 CTAB 法提取 DNA。结果显示,该方法不但能有效去除 PCR 抑制物,而且对水泡、火烧、土埋以及10年左右的骨骼所提取的 DNA 均能成功地进行荧光标记 STR 多基因座扩增检验。实验表明,该方法稳定,重复性好,适合陈旧骨骼标本的 DNA 提取。     

陈旧性骨骼DNA提取方法的探索

目的探索陈旧性骨骼DNA的提取方法。方法收集4~15年陈旧骨骼样本,去除表面污染物,经脱钙、裂解提取各样本DNA,使用QIAquickPCR Purification试剂盒进行纯化,检测DNA纯度和浓度,应用Power PlexFusion荧光标记复合扩增系统进行扩增,AB-3500型遗传分析仪检测STR分型。结果 15例陈旧性骨骼经提取、纯化,提取的DNA模板浓度较高,在42.9~176.4ng/μL之间,A260/A280值较稳定,在1.06~1.40之间;所有样本均获得完整STR分型。结论该方法简便快速,提取效果好,能够适用于法医学实际检案。     

DNA提取方法和PCR循环次数对STR扩增成功率的影响

目的探讨常见载体上的微量血痕DNA的提取方法、PCR循环次数对STR扩增成功率的影响。方法分别应用Chelex-100法及Chelex-100结合纯化法对8种载体上不同大小的血痕样本进行DNA提取,并采用28次、30次及34次PCR循环进行STR扩增,分别观察其扩增成功率。结果经28次、30次及34次PCR循环,Chelex-100法提取DNA后的STR扩增成功率分别为0.2917,0.3333,0.4583,Chelex-100结合纯化法的STR扩增成功率分别为0.3750,0.4583,0.8750。结论用Chelex-100结合纯化法提取DNA,用34次循环扩增可提高STR基因座的检测成功率。     

MagAttract(R)M48试剂盒在案例骨骼检验中的应用

陈旧性骨骼DNA检验的关键环节之一是模板DNA的提取及纯化,本文采用MagAttract(R)M48 DNAManual试剂盒(QIAGEN公司,简称M48试剂盒)对陈旧降解骨骼样本进行检验,结果如下.     

自动荧光分析法检验陈旧骨骼和牙齿的vWA和LPL位点

为鉴定陈旧骨骼和牙齿的尸源 ,对DNA的提取方法进行了研究,并建立了vWA和LPL位点的自动荧光分析技术,该法简便、快速、有效、可对存放2、3、4、7年的陈旧骨骼和牙齿成功地进行检验,在检验中能直接确定样品的等位基因     

福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织3种DNA提取方法比较

目的探讨经福尔马林固定1d石蜡包埋组织(FFPET)提取DNA的简易有效方法。方法比较水浴加热、微波加热和二甲苯脱蜡的效果。组织脱蜡后分别采用Chelex-100+层析柱纯化法、DNA IQTM试剂盒磁珠提取法和Chelex-100+磁珠纯化法提取DNA;实时荧光定量PCR技术定量DNA;荧光标记毛细管电泳技术进行STR分型。结果二甲苯脱蜡的效果好于其他两种加热的脱蜡方法(P<0.05)。Chelex-100+层析柱纯化所获得的DNA量显著高于其他两种方法(P<0.05)。结论二甲苯脱蜡、Chelex-100+层析柱纯化法是一种简单、有效的FFPET处理方法。     

应用磁珠法提取陈旧骨骼DNA

目的探讨采用磁珠法提取陈旧骨骼DNA的可行性。方法取经土埋或室外暴露下存放1~5年不等的10根长骨,经水洗、刮净,钻取骨密质骨粉3g,应用EQ1000磁珠试剂盒提取DNA,经复合扩增,ABI 3130XL基因分析仪电泳分离,进行STR分型检测。结果 10根长骨均获得完整的STR分型,电泳图谱基线干净,除个别大片段基因座外,等位基因荧光信号分布均衡性较好。结论采用磁珠法提取陈旧骨骼的DNA,能满足分型要求,可在实际检案中选用。     

A Simple and Efficient Method of Extracting DNA from Aged Bones and Teeth

DNA is often difficult to extract from old bones and teeth due to low levels of DNA and high levels of degradation. This study established a simple yet efficient method for extracting DNA from 20 aged bones and teeth (approximately 60 years old). Based on the concentration and STR typing results, the new method of DNA extraction (OM) developed in this study was compared with the PrepFiler? BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kit (BM). The total amount of DNA extracted using the OM method was not significantly different from that extracted using the commercial kit (p > 0.05). However, the number of STR loci detected was significantly higher in the samples processed using the OM method than using the BM method (p < 0.05). This study aimed to establish a DNA extraction method for aged bones and teeth to improve the detection rate of STR typing and reduce costs compared to the BM technique.     

利用AutoMate Express~(TM)系统提取陈旧性骨骼DNA

目的建立利用AutoMate Express~(TM)系统提取陈旧性骨骼DNA的方法。方法将骨骼用冷冻研磨机研磨成骨粉,经AutoMate Express~(TM)系统提取后,用Identifiler~Plus、MiniFiler~(TM)试剂盒扩增分型。结果10例保存在不同环境中、死亡时间在10~20年的骨骼样本利用AutoMate Express~(TM)系统3 h内完成DNA提取,有8例获得完整STR分型。结论 AutoMate Express~(TM)系统能快速、高效地提取陈旧性骨骼DNA,可应用于法医实际案件检验。     

Comparison of DNA yield after long-term storage of Second World War bone samples

Sample storage is of paramount importance in forensic genetics laboratories since only optimal storage enables successful recovery of DNA from old bones that contain very low amount of severely degraded DNA. When identification of missing persons from skeletal remains is completed, bone sample is routinely stored at -20 °C for long-term storage for retesting in future, if necessary. After molecular genetic analyses of Slovenian Second World War (WWII) victims, small fragments of femurs were stored at -20 °C. Reduction in DNA recovery has been observed in frozen liquid DNA extracts by some authors and the goal of our study was to explore how freezing of bone samples affects the preservation of DNA. To achieve this goal, the difference in DNA yield in extracts obtained from WWII bones analyzed in 2009 (data from published paper) and DNA yield in extracts obtained from the same bones (piece sampled next to the one used in 2009) taken out of the freezer after long-term storage on -20 °C for 10 years was examined, using the same extraction method and the same quantification kit. Up to 100 ng DNA/g of bone powder was obtained from 57 WWII femurs and up to 31 ng DNA/g of bone powder from the same femurs investigated after long-term storage in this study. 0,5 g of bone powder was decalcified using full demineralization extraction method. The DNA was purified in a Biorobot EZ1 device (Qiagen) and DNA quantity determined with the Human Quantifiler kit (TFS). Statistical analysis showed significant difference in DNA yield in extracts obtained from WWII bones in 2009 and extracts obtained from the same bones stored at -20 °C after 10 years. As reported for frozen liquid DNA extracts, reduction in recovery of DNA was confirmed for frozen bone samples as well.     

人骨骼及牙齿DNA提取方法的比较和优化

目的人骨骼和牙齿DNA提取方法的比较和优化。方法收集18份不同个体的长骨、30颗磨牙和同一个体2根股骨、8颗磨牙。利用TissueLyser-Ⅱ组织破碎仪和PreFiler Express BTA^TM法医DNA提取试剂盒（BTA法）,应用Automate Express^TM自动化法医DNA提取系统提取DNA,进行STR分型,与脱钙法进行比较,并进行实验条件优化。结果用TissueLyser-Ⅱ结合BTA法,约2.5h即可完成骨骼和牙齿的DNA提取,分型成功率分别为94.4%和96.7%。与脱钙法比较,两种方法获得DNA质量浓度和检出率比较接近（P〈0.05）,但BTA法在操作过程方面更具优势。最佳样本量为100mg,消化时间为2h。结论采用TissueLyser-Ⅱ组织破碎仪结合BTA法对骨骼和牙齿进行DNA提取和分型检验,能满足实际检案的要求,可在法医学实践中选择使用。     

利用AutoMate Express~(TM)自动化法医DNA提取系统提取骨骼及牙齿DNA

目的探讨建立骨骼及牙齿DNA自动化提取的新方法。方法将33份骨骼及15份牙齿样本分别用冷冻研磨和手工处理两种方法研磨成粉,采用AutoMate ExpressTM自动化法医DNA提取系统提取DNA并定量。结果 AutoMate ExpressTM自动化法医DNA提取系统能够在3h左右完成骨骼、牙齿DNA的提取,两种方法处理的骨骼样本所得DNA质量浓度差异无统计学意义。冷冻研磨处理的骨骼和牙齿样本均获得了较好的STR分型结果,且牙齿样本所得DNA质量浓度高于手工提取所得。结论应用AutoMate ExpressTM自动化法医DNA提取系统是自动化提取骨骼、牙齿DNA的一种新方法,可应用于法医实际案件检验。     

两种骨骼及牙齿纯化方法的比较分析

目的比较硅珠法和硅胶膜法对骨骼和牙齿的纯化效果。方法选择6根骨骼和8颗牙齿,进行消化后分别采用硅珠法与硅胶膜法进行纯化,用Global Filer~(?)试剂盒进行扩增检测,通过比较检出率和峰高来评价这两种方法。结果两种纯化方法均成功检测出了骨骼和牙齿的STR分型。同一样本中,相同基因座上两种方法检出的等位基因分型结果完全一致。两种方法处理得到的平均峰高差异无统计学意义。结论硅胶膜法在骨骼及牙齿的纯化中能满足实际常规检案的要求,且和硅珠法无明显差异,但在操作上更具优势,缺点是成本较高,在实际工作中可以选择使用。     

A simple and efficient method for extracting DNA from old and burned bone

It has been a challenge to extract DNA from bones previously soaked in water, burned, or buried for a long time, due to the reduced quality and quantity of DNA in the bone samples. The dramatic degradation of the DNA and the presence of PCR inhibitors in the collagen significantly complicate the process of DNA identification in dated and charred bones. In this article, we present a novel strategy to obtain DNA from bones based on the use of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) lysis buffer and isoamyl alcohol-chloroform extraction with subsequent DNA purification using the DNA IQ System, or alternatively the QIAquick system. When applied to bones soaked, burned or buried for up to nine years, this method increases the purity and yield of DNA with respect to the traditional phenol-chloroform method and significantly improves multiplex STR genotyping using fluorescence-based methods. The results of this research will assist forensic scientists in the identification of DNA from victims whose bodies underwent significant trauma or burning, precluding the utilization of traditional forensic DNA identification techniques.