三种磁珠法提取脱落细胞DNA的比较

正法医DNA鉴定中的脱落细胞检材是指含有人体皮肤黏膜脱落上皮细胞的检材,是当前刑事案件现场最有可能提取到的生物物证。目前关于脱落细胞提取纯化方法对比的报道~([1-3])较多,但相同提取方法效果横向比较的研究较少。本研究对IQ磁珠、M48磁珠、Prep Filer磁珠三种常见的磁珠法提取脱落细胞DNA的检验效果进行比较,为法庭科学实践提供参考依据,现报道如下。     

直接扩增法在血痕、肋软骨和唾液检材中的应用

目的采用Identifiler Direct PCR试剂盒直接扩增法进行棉签擦拭血痕、肋软骨和烟蒂唾液斑DNA分型检验,并评价其应用价值。方法收集棉签擦拭血痕、烟蒂各20份,肋软骨10份,采用Identifiler Direct PCR试剂盒进行直接扩增及分型检验,以相同检材采用磁珠法/Chelex-100法提取模板DNA后扩增检验结果作为对照,对两组所得结果进行比较分析。结果棉签擦拭血痕和肋软骨一次检测完整分型率均为100%,分型结果与对照组一致;烟蒂上唾液斑有2份检材第一次未能完整分型,调整方法再次检验后获分型成功。结论实际检案中的棉签血痕、肋软骨和烟上唾液斑,采用直接扩增法检测,方法简单、快速、稳定、检材用量小,可在实际检案中选择使用。     

国产磁珠结合自动化工作站批量提取生物检材DNA的应用

目的建立国产磁珠结合自动化工作站批量提取案件中生物检材DNA的方法。方法采用国产磁珠结合Bio-Robert Universal System自动化工作站对案件中常见的生物样本进行DNA提取,检测Identifiler系统16个STR基因座,在ABI3130XL遗传分析仪上进行STR分型。其中210份样品同时在ABI7500型荧光定量PCR仪上进行定量。结果9100份10类生物检材应用国产磁珠结合自动化工作站,大部分可提取到足够的DNA进行STR检验。STR检验成功率最高的为口腔拭子、肌肉,达100%,接触细胞检材的成功率较低,为50.0%。结论国产磁珠结合自动化工作站可用于案件中常见的大部分生物样本的DNA提取。     

改良EVO150-8方法在DNA自动化检案中的应用

目的探讨改良EVO150-8方法在批量生物检材DNA检验中的应用价值,建立一种自动化、简单、快速的DNA提取方法。方法采用改良EVO150-8自动化核酸提取纯化仪器与DNA IQ磁珠法纯化试剂盒,对各现场提取的880份血迹、烟蒂、口香糖、精斑（混合斑）、组织、骨骼、脱落细胞等常见生物检材进行DNA提取与纯化,采用Identifiler试剂盒进行扩增检验,用3130XL电泳,GeneMapper ID V3.2分析软件进行分析比对。结果在880份生物检材中,有836份检材成功获得STR分型;检验92份检材仅需时128min。结论改良EVO150-8适合批量生物检材的自动化提取。     

人体接触检材前处理方式对磁珠法提取DNA效果的影响

目的比较3种常见的接触检材前处理方式对磁珠法提取DNA效果的影响。方法收集烟蒂、牙刷、纱线手套各10份;分别采用95℃、70℃直接裂解和TNE、SDS、PK预消化方式进行前处理,再用磁珠法提取纯化DNA,并进行DNA定量,统计提取的接触DNA量和IPC CT值;同时用Sinofiler复合扩增系统进行STR分型检测。结果 3种方法前处理后用磁珠提取的DNA纯度均较高I,PC CT值在26.63～27.19之间。用预消化法获得的DNA量高于裂解法,而95℃裂解与70℃裂解方法提取的DNA量无显著性差异。STR扩增检测结果亦表明,采用预消化法处理的样品STR分型成功率高于裂解法9,5℃与70℃裂解方法处理的样品STR分型成功率无显著性差异。结论人体接触检材采用预消化磁珠法提取DNA,有助于提高STR检验成功率。     

M48磁珠法和Chelex-100法提取脱落细胞DNA的初步比较

目的对M48磁珠法和Chelex-100法提取脱落细胞DNA的检验效果进行比较,为优化提取方法提供参考。方法选取案件受理检材50例烟蒂、50例纺织物品、50例作案工具,根据不同条件分别用吸附法、沾附法获得DNA,采用磁珠法（M48）和Chelex-100法提取后,常规STR检测。结果烟蒂类检材采用2种方法提取DNA,所得结果没有明显差异;纺织物品和作案工具上脱落细胞DNA的提取采用M48磁珠法提取的效果明显优于Chelex-100法。结论相对而言,M48磁珠法更具优势。     

唾液斑DNA检验在性侵害案件中的应用

自从STR-PCR技术应用于生物物证的检验,微量生物学检材的DNA检测已成为可能。血液、毛发、骨骼、组织、人体分泌物(精斑、唾液、汗液)等物证检材均可通过DNA检验技术进行基因型分析。注意物证存在的多样性,广泛提取各种DNA物证成为在侦察破案中充分发挥DNA检验技术作用的关键。     

PowerPlex~18D直扩法与磁珠法用于血斑检验的比较

<正>直接扩增法可以免去提取的繁琐步骤,采用商品化直扩试剂盒,省时省力,能有效降低成本,因而被广泛用于DNA数据库建设。笔者对本实验室1年内受理案件的血斑检材采用直接扩增(简称直扩法)和经过磁珠法提取后再进行扩增(简称磁珠法)两种方法检验,比较两种方法对血斑类检材的检验效果,以期为相关检验提供参考。     

Chelex法和两种磁珠法提取接触DNA效果的比较

目的比较Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法对接触DNA的提取效果。方法将稀释为10ng、100ng的标准品DNA,分别采用Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法处理;对30例烟蒂和30例牙刷分别采用Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法和EQ国产磁珠法提取DNA,然后进行PCR定量和STR检测。结果Chelex法对DNA的提取无损失,DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法对DNA的提取均有不同程度的损失;烟蒂、牙刷等检材采用Chelex法提取的接触DNA量和IPC CT值显著高于IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法,但STR检验成功率却低于IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法。2种磁珠法提取的DNA量、IPC CT值和STR检验成功率无显著性差异。结论污染轻、杂质少的接触DNA检材,用Chelex法提取最为方便快捷;IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法更适合污染接触DNA检材的提取及自动化操作。     

PowerPlex(R)18D直扩法与磁珠法用于血斑检验的比较

直接扩增法可以免去提取的繁琐步骤,采用商品化直扩试剂盒,省时省力,能有效降低成本,因而被广泛用于DNA数据库建设[1].笔者对本实验室1年内受理案件的血斑检材采用直接扩增(简称直扩法)和经过磁珠法提取后再进行扩增(简称磁珠法)两种方法检验,比较两种方法对血斑类检材的检验效果,以期为相关检验提供参考.     

人体不同体液内PSA含量及其法医学意义

目的检测人体不同体液内前列腺特异抗原(PSA)含量,探讨其法医学价值。方法收集成年人(19～63岁)晨尿40份(男28份、女12份)、血液58份(男45份、女13份)、唾液25份(男14份、女11份);青少年(10～15岁)男性晨尿205份;哺乳期(25～31岁)女性乳汁9份;使用Cobas e411型全自动电化学发光免疫分析系统及T-PSA定量测定试剂盒,检测各样本T-PSA含量;分析不同体液及不同年龄青少年男性尿液PSA含量差异。结果除男、女性唾液外,其它样本均可检测到PSA,其中成年男性尿液含量最高,与其它体液比较具有显著性差异(P<0.000 1);青少年男性各年龄组尿液PSA含量随年龄逐年增高,11岁及以下年龄组含量不足1ng/mL,14岁及以上年龄组可超过1 000ng/mL。结论前列腺发育成熟的男性尿液PSA含量较高,在进行精液斑的法医学检验时应给予充分注意。     

DNA数据库建设中批量样本直接扩增检验法的应用

目的研究批量样本直接扩增法在DNA数据库建设中的应用。方法打孔机打取血滤纸600份,剪取芝麻大小的口腔拭子300份,放入96孔扩增板,加入扩增试剂后直接扩增,并对其中200份血滤纸用磁珠法,100份口腔拭子用96孔板Chelex-100法,经DNA提取后扩增检验进行比较。结果血滤纸采用直接扩增法及磁珠法STR检测成功率均为100%;口腔拭子采用直接扩增法的成功率为95%,采用96孔板Chelex-100法的成功率为94%。结论血滤纸和口腔拭子通过直接扩增均能获得很好的DNA分型结果,该方法省时省力,可用于DNA数据库建设。     

A novel method for the identification of saliva by detecting oral streptococci using PCR

We have used DNA amplification methods to detect common oral bacterial strains to test for the presence of saliva in forensic samples. Streptococcus salivarius and Streptococcus mutans were detected in various forms of saliva samples, whereas these streptococci were not detected in semen, urine, vaginal fluid, or on skin surfaces. Therefore, we demonstrated that these streptococci are promising new marker for the forensic identification of saliva. Our data indicated that S. salivarius is more reliable than S. mutans as an indicator of saliva presence, because the detection rates for S. salivarius and S. mutans by this method were 100% and 90%, respectively. Furthermore, S. salivarius was detected in all saliva stain samples, whereas S. mutans was only identified in 60% of the stains. Finally, using this method we were able to successfully detect S. salivarius and S. mutans in mock forensic samples. We therefore suggested that this method is useful for the identification of saliva in forensic science.     

Detection of human seminal γ-glutamyl transpeptidase in stains using sandwich ELISA

A sensitive and specific sandwich ELISA for human seminal γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) was developed using a combination of monoclonal antibodies, SG1 and SG3, which we produced. For semen identification in forensic samples, we modified the assay so as to be more sensitive and to establish efficient extracting conditions. After testing the extracting abilities of several detergents, CHAPS and deoxy-BIGCHAP were chosen as the solubilizer. Polystyrene beads coated with SG1 were incubated with samples extracted by the detergents, and further with biotinylated SG3, followed by peroxidase-labeled streptavidin. γ-GTP was detected only in seminal samples. The sensitivity of this assay was 0.01 ng/ml of seminal γ-GTP equivalent to 10⁷ times diluted semen, which was ten times as compared with the previous plate assay. No significant seminal γ-GTP was detected in other biological stains such as blood, saliva and vaginal smear. The extract of a 500 fold diluted seminal stain, 8 months old, showed the detection limit. Seminal γ-GTP was detectable even in 14-year-old stains.     

Estimation of ethanol concentrations in biological media. Comparison of alkylnitrite and direct vapor-phase methods

Ethanol assays in the blood, saliva and urine were made according to two methods: alkylnitrite gas-liquid chromatography and direct vapor-phase method without thermostating. N-propanol was used as an internal standard. For saliva and urine the methods produced similar results. For blood, the direct vapor-phase method detected significantly lower level of ethanol compared to alkylnitrite one (p = 0.001). 24-h storage of the samples in refrigerator does not deviate the results. Recommendations are provided for most effective usage of each method.     

磁珠法自动化纯化现场检材DNA方法研究

目的利用TE-MAGS在TECAN工作站上结合磁珠试剂盒,建立自动化工作站批量纯化现场检材DNA的方法,并探讨其在法医物证检案中的应用。方法灵敏度测试:标准品使用0.1ng/μL 9947A,用200μL TES稀释制备DNA总量0.1ng~1ng共10种的标准样品,采用本文方法提取纯化,使用IdentifilerTM试剂盒扩增,用3130XL型测序仪检测,Gene Mapper ID-X分析,分析STR图谱质量;纯化能力测试:在1ng总量的标准样品中加入腐殖酸、血红素,采用本文方法提取纯化、扩增检测,分析STR图谱质量;实际案件应用对比:收集304份现场检材,分别采用本方法和硅珠法进行提取纯化,经扩增检测,统计对比两种提取纯化方法 STR分型成功率。结果灵敏度测试:0.1ng~0.2ng总量标准样品提取的DNA模板,扩增后可检测到部分基因座STR图谱,0.3ng~1ng总量标准样品提取的DNA模板,扩增后可以得到完整的STR图谱;纯化能力测试:对混合有一定浓度的腐殖酸、血红素的标准样品的提取产物检测图谱未见明显抑制;实际案件应用对比测试:304份现场检材工作站磁珠法检出成功率(50%)高于硅珠法(40.8%)。结论本文所建立的方法缓冲范围较大,回收率高,纯化能力强,提取产物STR分型成功率高,适合现场检材批量化DNA检验。     

固相萃取-气相色谱法检测生物检材中斑蝥素

目的建立固相萃取-气相色谱法检测生物检材中斑蝥素的方法。方法采用HLB固相萃取柱提取,气相色谱-内标法检测。结果斑蝥素在0.1～200mg/L范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数为0.999以上;精密度（RSD）小于5%。对于添加血样,方法检出限为0.05μg/mL,加标回收率范围为93.03%～98.29%。结论该方法操作简便、快速、灵敏,提取回收率高,提取物含杂质较少,可用于实际案件中全血和尿样中斑蝥素的检测。     

A dedicated automated system for extraction, quantification and STR amplification of forensic evidence samples

Forensic DNA analysis is a multi-step process involving extraction of DNA, quantification of human DNA in the extract, amplification using multiplex STR systems, separation of products, and data analysis. The backlog of forensic casework is increasing worldwide. Automation is one significant way to alleviate the bottleneck of sample processing in forensic labs. The HID EVOlution™ Combination System described here is a robust, reliable sample processing platform, easily adapted to forensic laboratory workflows. Using a variety of forensic sample types including: blood stained FTA paper, cotton fabric and denim, dried blood spiked with known PCR inhibitors, saliva on cotton swabs, and semen stains, we found that yields of human DNA and STR profiles obtained with AmpFlSTR^® Idenitfiler^® kits were complete, highly reproducible, and equivalent to results obtained using the manual PrepFiler™ reagent extraction method. Automated operation was clean, and no cross-contamination was detected between extraction blanks and interspersed high DNA content samples.