运用党史资源开展干部教育培训的思考

中国共产党的辉煌历史是中华民族极其宝贵的精神财富，是推进中国特色社会主义伟大事业和党的建设新的伟大工程的重力量源泉。在世情、国情、党情发生深刻变化的情况下，加强党史教育，用党的伟大成就激励人，成功经验启迪人，历史教训警示人，使广大党员干部以史为鉴，继往开来，是摆在我们面前亟待研究解决的紧迫问题。把党史纳入干部教育培训的必修课，从历史中总结经验，汲取教训，提高领导水平和执政能力，是推进全面建成小康社会的有力举措。     

我国生育证立法与执法的错位及其矫正

生育证制度是我国计划生育政策所孕育的一项管理公民生育行为的法律制度。当前，生育证的立法精神已由管制生育自由向服务生育自由转变，但其行政执法却仍然是以管制为核心的干预行政，由此导致生育证立法与执法之间形成一种错位。应以服务生育自由的立法精神来矫正错位，以给付行政理念来规范生育证制度，摆脱行政许可的固有思维，简化办理程序与加强制度创新，特别要注重丰富制度本身的公共服务内容。     

变革期的政党制度化与国家治理体系变迁——改革开放时期中国共产党领导体制制度化分析

政治发展和民主转型是政党制度化研究的主流范式。两种范式及其研究路径都无视政党制度化在国家治理体系变迁中的意义。国家治理视角下的政党制度化研究,旨在寻求政党研究在比较政治学中的"回归"。变革期中国共产党的领导体制制度化过程表明:政党制度化是解释中国国家治理体系变迁动力、路径和走向的关键变量。中国共产党通过领导体制的法制化、组织和价值基础的双重理性化和政策治理网络的优化,实现了中国国家治理体系渐进性的变迁。     

合作司法:司法公信力的社会治理谱系——基于福柯权力谱系学的展开

司法公信力是司法的生命力所在,也是全面深化改革在司法领域中的着力点。构筑司法公信力需要从社会治理高度对司法运作机制以重新审视。合作司法是社会治理谱系下从管理向治理转变在司法中的体现。降低司法成本和实践司法公正是合作司法实践路径中的两个向度,统筹两者是合作司法之于司法公信力的意蕴所在。     

全球化进程与当代政府管理创新

政府管理创新是世界各国政府发展的总趋势。全球化进程作为一个大的时代背景,在加强国与国联系的同时,必然推动着各国政府外部管理体制和内部运作机制的相互学习和自我创新。全球化进程对当代政府管理更是提出了许多全新的要求:一、全球化进程必然要求当代政府管理对于新的国际情势有一个制度上的回应;二、全球化进程使得一个主权国家政府管理的内部事务衍生出外部意义;三、全球化进程要求政府管理从传统的"自上而下"的统治走向"上下互动"的治理;四、全球化进程要求当代政府管理在全球范围内关注生态治理、环境保护和和平共处的问题。     

试论现代治理理论对我国治理经济犯罪的启示

在我国社会主义市场经济飞速发展的今天,经济犯罪作为社会的一个伴生物也越来越多。20世纪70年代,西方社会出现了对社会治理理论的深刻反思,提出了现代治理理论。现代治理理论对我国经济犯罪的的防范与控制也起着一定的作用,因此,有必要借鉴西方的现代治理理论防范与控制我国的经济犯罪活动。     

社群主义、服务型政府与善治

服务型政府是我国行政管理体制改革的总体目标,善治是现代公共管理的新模式,是实现服务型政府的必经途径.社群主义提出的公益优先、均衡个人与社会、维护社会公平、建设积极政府等主张,对创建服务型政府、实现善治有着重要的启迪作用.     

Deconstructing Deliberation in the Appraisal of Medical Technologies: NICEly Does it?

Appraisals of medical technologies undertaken by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) have significant implications for the setting of priorities for health care expenditure in the NHS in England and Wales. NICE has been characterised as a deliberative body, an evaluation which reflects the recent attention paid by those working within the health policy community to the establishment of mechanisms which deliver procedural justice, in the absence of societal consensus upon the substantive values which should underpin distributive choices in health care. This article critically interrogates the assessment of NICE as deliberative in character. It also considers the relationship between legitimacy and deliberation in this policy context, in light of the claim that 'thickening proceduralisation' by establishing and enhancing deliberative structures and processes is a useful strategy for addressing regulatory problems.     

欧美等国公司内部监督机制对我国的启示

各国公司治理结构可分为英美的外部监控模式和德国的内部监控模式,法国属兼采用两种模式的国家。我国公司法应授权公司选择单层制或双层制,并对监事会权力作出重新调整,限制董事和监事的兼职数量,加强银行和债权人在公司治理中的作用。     

Europeanising Gender Mainstreaming: Constraints and Opportunities in the Multilevel Euro-polity

What are the conditions for empowering `gender mainstreaming' as a new policy frame beyond the supranational level in member states and regions of the European Union? This paper is premised on the following assumptions: that mainstreaming will reduce gender disparities in Europe only if it takes root at all levels of decision-making, but that some national gender regimes can be expected to resist mainstreaming more than others, especially because it does not command `hard' legal tools. The puzzle to be examined is how mainstreaming can become effective across the European multilevel polity. It is argued that vis-à-visthe resistance of domestic gender regimes, the Europeanisation of equal treatment norms in national, regional and local contexts over the past decades has generated a variety of mechanisms for the cross-border diffusion of new policy ideas that can help to promote mainstreaming. Drawing on comparative Europeanisation research, this argument is developed in three steps. First, the past performance of member states in the implementation of E.U. gender directives is explored, to identify patterns and dynamics and classify leaders and laggards. Second, current mainstreaming experiences in one of the most conspicuous laggard states – Germany – are examined closely. Finally, as a means of explaining the rather intense engagement of German federal and regional governments with mainstreaming, two factors are highlighted: elite learning, and new governance instruments developed by the E.U. Notwithstanding the steps taken to promote mainstreaming, the prospects for further institutionalization within the E.U. appear contingent on the outcome of the Convention on the Future of the Union and the Intergovernmental Conference planned for 2004, since the invigorating of the subsidiarity principle and the division of competences across the multilevel polity are key issues of debate. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.