Understanding the psychological aspects of the radicalisation process:a sociocognitive approach

Understanding the psychological dimensions underlying the radicalisation process is a considerable challenge in the context of the legal judicial treatment of perpetrators of acts of radical violence. This clinical and qualitative study is based on an analysis of legal expert interviews of people at different stages of the radicalisation process. It highlights common psychological characteristics in personality, mechanisms of moral neutralisation and sociocognitive and interpretive treatment during radicalisation. These observations suggest the applicability of a model of cognitive–emotional transformation of self and meaning-building in radical violent engagement.     

乡村社区治理研究：分析范式、分析方法及研究视角的述评

乡村社区治理是国家基层社会治理的重要组成部分,也一直受到学术界的高度重视。当前,乡村社区治理研究主流分析范式具有“二元性”,研究方法及分析单位“类型化”、研究视角具有“多元性”特征。总体上来看,既有的社区治理研究已经开始落后于乡村社区发展,需要进行创新与探索。在研究范式上,应将市场力量纳入乡村社区治理的研究范畴,尝试构建“国家一市场一社会”的分析范式;在研究方法及研究单位上,应该尝试将心理学、行为学、经济学、管理学及数学方法引入到乡村社区研究中,实现多学科的交叉性,通过大样本与小个案的结合、定性与定量的结合、不同层级研究单位的结合,力争研究的科学性,提升研究理论的厚度;在研究视角上,应更加注重本土性研究,力争从本土现实、历史发展及中国特有的乡村特征为基础,在现代社会转型中探寻提炼本土理论。不被既有的研究思维所限制,保持研究的多样性、灵活性与丰富性。才能够更好地实现进步与创新。     

法律起源的进化生物学解释

法律起源研究是观察和探讨一切现代法律现象的前提,是法理学的基础问题之一。不同法学流派以及哲学、人类学、社会学或心理学等学科都对这一问题提出了不同的解释,但至今无法取得基本共识。如果仍然局限于传统研究范式,其研究取得重大进展的可能性已经不大。生物进化既包括有机体进化,也包括文化进化,二者均为进化生物学的研究对象。法律是一种文化现象,而文化现象至少1400万年前就已在生物界中出现并进化至今,因此法律必定脱胎于文化进化史的某个阶段,这就为在法律起源问题研究中引入进化生物学范式提供了可能。     

以心理治疗反思社会文化

20世纪50年代以后出现的行为(认知-行为)治疗范式致力于治疗方法与技术的创新和改进,旨在提高人们对环境的适应性,但却忽略了对社会和社会文化的考察;人本主义治疗范式把关注的焦点放在社会和社会文化上,以探索适合人的全面发展的社会和文化条件,可是没能在治疗的技术和方法上有所建树.20世纪末,受后现代思潮影响而出现的叙事治疗范式创造性地提出了"外化问题"的技术,并在此基础上整合了微观和宏观的治疗取向,把治疗实践和反思主流文化成功地结合在一起,从而为心理治疗领域注入了新的活力.     

略论法学研究范式的历史类型

本文以库恩的“范式”为基础,对法学思想史中的自然法学、分析-实证法学、社会学法学等重要法学流派进行了范式类型划分,总结出历史唯物主义法学研究范式和历史唯心主义法学研究范式、应然型法学研究范式和实然型法学研究范式、概念法学研究范式和经验法学研究范式、建构论法学研究范式和进化论法学研究范式等几个对应性范式,条分缕析,不仅提供了新颖的法理学研究视角,而且具有比较重要的现实意义。     

非政府组织的勃兴与国际法律秩序的变塑

非政府组织在全球范围的勃兴,给传统的国际法律秩序带来重要影响和挑战,表层上它的活动与国际法诸项环节都发生关联,深层上揭示了全球化时代法治理念、秩序模式的变塑,并在此基础上确立非政府组织的国际法律地位。     

EDWIN H. SUTHERLAND AND THE MICHAEL‐ADLER REPORT: SEARCHING FOR THE SOUL OF CRIMINOLOGY SEVENTY YEARS LATER*

In response to a devastating critique of the state of criminology known as the Michael‐Adler Report, Edwin H. Sutherland created differential association theory as a paradigm for the field of criminology. I contend that Sutherland's strategy was flawed because he embraced a sociological model of crime and in doing so adopted a form of sociological positivism. Furthermore, Sutherland ignored key facts about crime that were contrary to his theoretical predilections. Recognizing that facts must come first and that criminology is an interdisciplinary field of study, I offer life‐course criminology as a paradigm for understanding the causes and dynamics of crime. In addition, I identify three warning signs that I believe inhibit the advancement of criminology as a science and a serious intellectual enterprise.     

经济全球化与发达国家的政府治理范式创新运动

90年以来，西方发达国家掀起了旨在构建适应经济全球化的政府治理范式运动，以便完善国家创新体系，增强国家竞争力。本着重分析了这一运动的基本内涵、兴起的动因及其理念取向，目的是把握经济全球化时代政府治理范式创新的大趋势，以便为我国行政改革理论的完善和行政改革实践的推行提供有益的启示和借鉴。     

Techno-economic paradigm versus the market: on recent theories of late industrialization

The recent resurgence of intellectual interest in industrialization has been stimulated by the emergence of a wealth of empirical evidence which constitutes a reinterpretation of the East Asian experience, and the rise in mainstream academia of the 'new' theories of trade and growth. Both of these two bodies or writings point to the necessity of placing technological development at the centre of industrialization. There is however considerable doubt among economists over this tematic shift away from the hitherto dominant emphasis on incentive. There are also conceptual ambiguites over the nature of technological development that need to be clarified. This paper aims to reaffirm the centrality of technological development, and to argue that the imperative of technological development normally outstrips the capacity of the regulation of the market.     

To Our Benefit or at Your Expense? Justice Considerations in Intergroup Allocations of Positive and Negative Resources

Several studies consistently demonstrated a positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In line with classical minimal group experiments, laboratory groups favored their in-group when allocating positive resources or evaluating positive dimensions. However, they refrained from discriminating behavior as soon as negative resources had to be distributed between groups. We propose that this is due to valence-specific differences in the consideration and perception of social justice. Several studies tested whether social norms inhibiting in-group favoritism and out-group derogation are differently interpreted or weighed due to the valence of resources. Consequently, a survey of these studies is given and their implications for classical theories on intergroup behavior and future research on social discrimination are discussed.