多重置换扩增技术用于法医学微量DNA检测效果

目的探讨多重置换扩增(MDA)技术对法医学微量DNA样品STR检测分型的效果。方法用MDA技术对不同模板量DNA进行全基因组扩增(WGA),扩增产物用实时荧光定量PCR技术定量、用Profiler PlusTM试剂盒检测基因型。结果该方法可对模板DNA增加104～106倍。1ng样品DNA的MDA产物可获得9个STR基因座和Amelogenin性别基因座的准确分型结果;低于0.1ng的样品DNA经MDA扩增后,基因座检出数增加,但可见等位基因不平衡或丢失现象。结论MDA技术可有效增加DNA模板量和提高微量DNA分型效果。但样品DNA量低于0.1ng时,MDA产物的STR分型结果判读须慎重。     

多重置换扩增技术用于法医学微量DNA检测效果

目的探讨多重置换扩增（MDA）技术对法医学微量DNA样品STR检测分型的效果。方法用MDA技术对不同模板量DNA进行全基因组扩增（WGA）．扩增产物用实时荧光定量PCR技术定量、用Prrfiler Plus^TM试剂盒检测基因型。结果该方法可对模板DNA增加10^4～10^6倍。1ng样品DNA的MDA产物可获得9个STR基因座和Amelogenin性别基因座的准确分型结果；低于0．1ng的样品DNA经MDA扩增后，基因座检出数增加。但可见等位基因不平衡或丢失现象。结论MDA技术可有效增加DNA模板量和提高微量DNA分型效果。但样品DNA量低于0．1ng时，MDA产物的STR分型结果判读须慎重。     

改良IPEP法用于痕量DNA检测的实验研究

目的探讨改良扩增前引物延伸(IPEP)法对痕量DNA样本STR检测分型的效果。方法用改良IPEP法对痕量样品DNA进行全基因组扩增(WGA),扩增产物用实时荧光定量PCR技术定量、用AmpFLSTR~ Indentifiler~试剂盒作基因型检测。结果该方法可增加模板DNA约200~1100倍。基因组DNA不低于0.025ng时,可获得15个STR基因座和Amelogenin性别基因座的分型结果。基因组DNA0.01~0.025ng时,可获得9个以上基因座的分型结果。结论改良IPEP法可有效提高痕量DNA样本STR分型检验的灵敏度,有较好的实用价值。     

模板DNA用量对荧光STR复合扩增检测的影响

目的 探讨模板DNA用量对荧光STR复合扩增检测的影响,寻求荧光STR复合扩增检测的最适扩增模板DNA用量。方法 采用模板DNA(9947A)不同的扩增用量,对Profiler Plus试剂盒的基因座进行扩增,在3100型全自动遗传分析仪上作了检测。结果 3100型遗传分析仪检测的最适扩增模板DNA用量在0.31～2.5ng之间。结论 模板DNA量过高或过低均会影响荧光STR复合扩增检测结果的可靠性。     

Chelex-100提取生物检材DNA实时PCR定量研究

目的研究Chelex-100法提取的生物检材DNA用量与复合STR分型成功率的关系。方法113份各种生物检材采用Chelex-100法提取DNA，应用Quantifiler人类DNA定量试剂盒在ABI 7500荧光定量PCR仪上进行实时PCR定量，同时用Identifiler复合扩增系统在ABI 3100遗传分析仪上对这些DNA样品进行STR分型。结果各种生物检材提取的DNA浓度分别为：37份滤纸、纱布血痕0．042～5．28ng／μl，16份口腔拭子1．15—4．21ng／μl，18份烟头0．016～1．46ng／μl，10份肋软骨0．531—14．40ng／μl，8份肌肉5．75—24．80ng／μl，7份指甲0．788—11．50ng／μl，17份精斑0．79～99．50ng／μl。在建立的8μl扩增体系中，根据上述结果，调整用于复合STR扩增的DNA模板量在0．5—3ng之间，大部分样品可获得完全的STR分型。结论Chelex-100法提取的检材DNA模板用量在0．5—3ng之间可得到有效STR扩增，浓度为0．5ng／μl以上的DNA样品，用小体积模板（1μl）比大体积（3μl）模板扩增效果好。     

口腔拭子DNA检验的实时定量研究

目的寻求提高口腔拭子的DNA检验效率的方法。方法对来源于不同个体或同一个体不同擦拭次数的口腔拭子用Chelex-100或磁珠法提取的DNA用实时定量PCR技术进行定量,同时用Identifiler复合扩增系统在ABI3100遗传分析仪上对这些DNA样品进行STR分型。结果在建立的Identifiler系统8μl扩增体系中,3个月内的口腔拭子用Chelex-100法提取的DNA模板1μl量较3μl量扩增效果好,磁珠法提取的DNA模板用量大小对复合扩增检测影响较小。结论用棉签擦拭颊粘膜5次制备口腔拭子,取其头部的约1/4用200μlChelex-100法提取DNA,然后用1μl模板进行复合扩增,是提高口腔拭子的DNA检验效率的简便可行的方法,但陈旧口腔拭子用磁珠法提取更能保证复合扩增分型成功。     

PCR扩增循环数与低拷贝模板DNA的STR分型

目的探讨PCR扩增循环数对低拷贝模板DNA的STR分型的影响。方法模板DNA(9947A)的不同扩增用量(含低拷贝模板量),采用ProfilerPlus试剂盒,扩增循环数分别为28、30、32、34、38次,3100型基因分析仪(ABI,美国)检测结果。结果循环数从28次增至38次,模板DNA量最低检出量可从0.25ng减少至0.0312ng;先循环28次后,每反应加0.3μlAmpliTaqGoldDNA聚合酶,再循环6次较1次34个循环的检测灵敏度高,相当于1次38个循环的效果。结论增加PCR扩增循环数,可能影响低拷贝模板DNA的STR分型。     

AmpF(l)STR(R) Identifiler(R) Plus试剂盒快速直接PCR扩增初探

目的 探索可应用于法医实践的快速直接PCR扩增方法,以缩短扩增时间,提高STR分型速率.方法 联合运用AmpF(l)STR(R) Identifiler(R) Plus试剂盒与TaKaRa快速PCR检测试剂构建快速直接PCR体系,以FTA血卡为模板,采用优化后的扩增程序在快速PCR仪上进行扩增,分型结果与常规直接扩增方法相比较.结果 AmpF(l)fSTR(R) Identifiler(R) Plus试剂盒与TaKaRa的快速PCR检测试剂针对血卡的联合扩增,所得STR分型结果与常规方法一致,扩增用时由常规直接扩增所需的175 min缩短为55 min.结论 采用快速直接PCR方法进行扩增,可得到与常规直接扩增一致的DNA分型,扩增时间明显缩短,DNA分型速率大幅提高.     

直接扩增法在血痕、肋软骨和唾液检材中的应用

目的采用Identifiler Direct PCR试剂盒直接扩增法进行棉签擦拭血痕、肋软骨和烟蒂唾液斑DNA分型检验,并评价其应用价值。方法收集棉签擦拭血痕、烟蒂各20份,肋软骨10份,采用Identifiler Direct PCR试剂盒进行直接扩增及分型检验,以相同检材采用磁珠法/Chelex-100法提取模板DNA后扩增检验结果作为对照,对两组所得结果进行比较分析。结果棉签擦拭血痕和肋软骨一次检测完整分型率均为100%,分型结果与对照组一致;烟蒂上唾液斑有2份检材第一次未能完整分型,调整方法再次检验后获分型成功。结论实际检案中的棉签血痕、肋软骨和烟上唾液斑,采用直接扩增法检测,方法简单、快速、稳定、检材用量小,可在实际检案中选择使用。     

应用DNA工作站进行批量血斑STR分型的研究

目的建立对大批量血斑样品PCR-STR基因分型检测的自动化新方法。方法应用自动化DNA工作站改良优化Chelex-100法和DNAIQ磁珠法的实验条件,建立两种批量血斑的自动化DNA提取方法;筛选确定PCR-STR反应体系的构建和PCR-STR产物测序电泳分析前处理程序。结果1104份血斑样品经Chelex-100法批量提取、Profiler Plus试剂盒扩增均一次检出9个STR基因座,定量PCR测定模板浓度均值为0.43ng/ml,荧光检测信号在200~800RFU之间;对其中114份血斑样品用DNAIQ磁珠法批量提取、同试剂盒扩增均一次检出9个STR基因座,定量PCR测定模板浓度均值为0.7ng/ml,荧光检测信号在1000~2000RFU之间;对其中50份血斑进行自动和手动Chel-ex-100检验法比较,成功率分别为100%和98%,且前者等位基因峰高信号更均衡。结论本文建立的自动化DNA工作站批量检测方法,在成功率、稳定性、均一性等方面具有优势。     

运用酚-氯仿法结合磁珠法提取蝇蛆体内人类DNA

目的建立运用酚-氯仿法结合磁珠法从蝇蛆嗉囊内提取人类DNA的方法,从而提高STR分型检验的灵敏度。方法采用酚-氯仿法对蝇蛆嗉囊内容物中的人类DNA进行提取,提取产物经磁珠法纯化浓缩后用QuantifilerTM人类DNA定量试剂盒在7500型实时荧光定量PCR仪上进行PCR定量,再用AmpF■STR IndentifilerTM试剂盒在3130XL-Avant遗传分析仪上对这些DNA样本进行STR分型。结果本研究建立的方法可增加模板DNA浓度约为单独使用酚-氯仿法的2倍。用此方法提取到的DNA浓度[（0.218±0.041）ng/μL]可获得全部16个STR分型结果。结论酚-氯仿法结合磁珠法可以有效地提高提取到的人类DNA样本STR分型检验的灵敏度,对于从事法医昆虫学方面研究的工作者有较好的实用价值。     

吸附性载体上微量血痕的DNA分型

目的研究吸附性载体上微量血痕的DNA提取及其检验。方法用Chelex-100法、QIAamp MiniKit、及QIAamp Mini Kit改良法提取吸附性载体上微量血痕中的DNA,进行PCR扩增及STR检验。结果采用Chelex-100法及QIAamp Mini Kit的分型成功率很低;采用QIAamp Mini Kit的改良法能较好的得到分型图谱。结论采用QIAamp Mini Kit的改良法能较好的提取吸附性载体上微量血痕的模板DNA。     

Optimization of DNA recovery from toothbrushes

In human identification, the victim's toothbrush is an invaluable personal item as the deposited cellular material contains DNA from which a reference profile can be produced. The profile obtained then allows direct comparison to be made with the profile from the unidentified body. This study was undertaken to determine the minimum number of bristle bundles that would generate a complete DNA profile. The minimum period of usage for a toothbrush to retain enough cells for genotyping was also investigated. We also tested two commonly used DNA extraction methods: QIAamp^® DNA Mini Kit and Chelex^® 100 to explore the efficiency of these protocols in recovering DNA from toothbrushes. In this experiment, volunteers brushed their teeth for 1, 7, 14, or 30 days. DNA was extracted from 5 and 10 bundles of bristles cut from the collected toothbrushes. The amount of DNA recovered was quantified by quantitative real-time PCR, and DNA genotyping was performed for each sample. Data revealed that QIAamp^® DNA Mini Kit performed better at yielding DNA in terms of purity, quantity, and quality than Chelex^® 100. It was also found that, with a suitable method of recovery, DNA samples from five bundles of bristles from all of the toothbrushes generated complete profiles. Based on the experimental results, a general guideline concerning the appropriate extraction method and the quantity of the starting material for the analysis of DNA from toothbrushes could be suggested.     

Comparisons of protocols for enhanced DNA profile quality from FTA®-deposited urine samples

Disputes over the identity of a urine sample donor have been reported, and urine authentication by genetic profiling has helped resolved the cases. However, since genotyping of urine is not always required, many drug-testing laboratories may face sample storage issues. Several studies have investigated the use of FTA® cards as a convenient tool for keeping specimen at room temperature for extended periods of time. However, generating complete STR profile from some FTA®-deposited urine samples remains challenging due to low levels of genetic material content, necessitating amendments to the laboratory’s standard protocols. This work therefore aims to evaluate the effects of two DNA template preparation methods, both employing FTA® cards as the storage medium, on the success rates of STR profiling from urine. Specimen from a female volunteer, representing a particularly low-yield sample, was employed. Aliquots of 1 and 2 mL were used as the starting material to evaluate DNA template preparation using the FTA® manufacturer’s protocol for disc purification against elution of DNA from the FTA® using Prepfiler™ Forensic DNA Extraction Kit. AmpFℓSTR™ Identifiler™ Plus PCR Amplification Kit was used to amplify the STR markers, and the PCR products were analysed using Applied Biosystems™ 3500xL Genetic Analyzer. The DNA profile qualities were examined in terms of number of loci detected and peak height balance. Comparisons with the profiles obtained from DNA isolated using QIAamp® DNA Micro Kit from 1 and 2 mL of the same batch of urine were also made. The optimised protocol was then tested on urine samples from three male volunteers. The results showed that the purification of FTA® punches according to the manufacturer’s protocol enabled full DNA profiles to be obtained from both 1 and 2 mL of urine from all samples tested, including male samples. In contrast, no DNA profile could be generated from the DNA eluted with the Prepfiler™ kit. When compared with the more conventional solid-phase DNA extraction method, the profiles generated from the FTA® punches exhibited similar reproducibility and quality to those from the template isolated by the QIAamp® Kit. This work further demonstrated the feasibility of FTA® cards as a tool for specimen storage and DNA template preparation from small volumes of urine for authentication by STR profiling. Full STR profiles could be generated from sample from both sexes without modification of the PCR conditions or injection time.     

福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织3种DNA提取方法比较

目的探讨经福尔马林固定1d石蜡包埋组织(FFPET)提取DNA的简易有效方法。方法比较水浴加热、微波加热和二甲苯脱蜡的效果。组织脱蜡后分别采用Chelex-100+层析柱纯化法、DNA IQTM试剂盒磁珠提取法和Chelex-100+磁珠纯化法提取DNA;实时荧光定量PCR技术定量DNA;荧光标记毛细管电泳技术进行STR分型。结果二甲苯脱蜡的效果好于其他两种加热的脱蜡方法(P<0.05)。Chelex-100+层析柱纯化所获得的DNA量显著高于其他两种方法(P<0.05)。结论二甲苯脱蜡、Chelex-100+层析柱纯化法是一种简单、有效的FFPET处理方法。     

Recovery of DNA from bone without demineralization

This study assessed the performance of five different DNA extraction methods for the recovery of DNA from bone: ChargeSwitch® gDNA Plant Kit, DNA IQ™ System Kit, DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit, PrepFiler® BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kit and phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol. DNA was extracted from pig rib and femur bones that was fresh, had undergone surface decomposition for three months, and had undergone surface decomposition for one year. Extracted DNA was analyzed using real-time PCR and amplification of an in-house PCR multiplex that assessed the quality and quantity of DNA and for the presence of inhibitors. The phenol-chloroform-based method consistently yielded the highest amounts of DNA and DNA IQ the lowest; however, all methods produced relatively high yields of DNA from both pig rib and femur samples that could be amplified without any detected inhibition. The data demonstrate that with reasonable quality bone samples any of the tested methods can isolate DNA that can be successfully analyzed. The effective use of internal PCR controls is also demonstrated.     

微量DNA的短串联重复序列分型可行性

目的了解微量DNA分型的法医学应用的可行性。方法一系列浓度的DNA模板用PowerPlexTM16System试剂盒扩增,并用ABI377DNA测序仪进行短串联重复序列(STR)的分型。结果当模板量小于250pg时,部分位点发生了等位基因漏扩,并出现非特异带、杂合子扩增不平衡等干扰分型的杂峰。结论上述这些不正常的现象可能会导致分型错误。在对微量检材的DNA检验结果进行判型时一定要小心谨慎,全面考虑。