Zuständigkeit für Klage auf Aufteilung einer Nachlasssache

Die Klage auf Aufhebung der Miteigentumsgemeinschaft an einer einzelnen Nachlasssache kann Erbteilungsklage iSv § 77 Abs 2 JN sein.     

猪圆环病毒2型猪伪狂犬病病毒和猪细小病毒三重PCR检测方法的建立

针对猪圆环病毒2型(PCV2)ORF2、猪伪狂犬病病毒(PRV)gD和猪细小病毒(PPV)VP2基因保守区域,设计了特异性引物,在分别建立单一病毒基因PCR检测方法的基础上,通过对3组引物的比例和浓度、dNTPs和Mg2 浓度、退火温度等条件的优化,建立了针对上述3种病毒的三重PCR检测方法。敏感性试验表明,应用该方法最低可检测到4×10-4ng/μL的PRV双链DNA模板和2×10-5ng/μL的PCV2和PPV单链DNA模板。对21份自然感染病猪样品的检测结果表明,该三重PCR检测结果与单一PCR检测的结果完全符合。试验结果显示,建立的三重PCR方法可用于3种DNA病毒的同时检测,具有快速、准确的特点,有临床应用前景。     

中国汉族人群2个高变MVR基因座遗传多态性

常染色体小卫星基因座D16S309(MS205)位于16p13.3(AE006466)[1],核心序列为45~54bp,重复次数8~87次[2]。D2S44(YNH24)基因座位于2q21.3-q22(AJ001534)[3],核心序列为31bp。本文采用MVR-PCR技术,选择重复单位3′侧翼区引物(公共引物)和MVR特异性引物匹配进行PCR扩增,对中国河北汉族人群2个基因座遗传多态性进行了调查。1材料与方法1.1样本及DNA提取116份枸橼酸钠抗凝血样由河北省血液中心提供,采自无血缘关系汉族健康个体。常规饱和酚-氯仿法提取DNA。1.2MVR-PCRD16S309引物序列参见文献[2,4]。反应体系为25μl,分别加入5μl…     

Vertretung einer "Vorpartei"

Hat eine politische Partei durch Hinterlegung ihrer Satzung beim BMI gem § 1 Abs 4 Parteiengesetz Rechtspers?nlichkeit erlangt, sind aber in diesem Zeitpunkt die organschaftlichen Vertreter entsprechend den in der Satzung vorgesehenen Organen noch nicht bestellt, so vertreten bis zur Bestellung der organschaftlichen Vertreter in analoger Anwendung von § 2 Abs 2 Satz 2 VerG 2002 die Gründer gemeinsam die politische Partei.     

Teilkündigung der Mitbenützung eines Kellerraums zur Aufstellung von Waschmaschinen

Die Benützung einer allen Mietern zug?nglichen Waschküche unterliegt nicht der separaten Aufkündigung nach § 31 MRG, sondern dem § 8 Abs 2 MRG.     

数字化校园平台建设技术探索

数字化校园是利用计算机技术、网络技术、通讯技术对学校与教学、科研、管理和生活服务有关的所有信息资源进行全面的数字化；并用科学规范的管理对这些信息资源进行整合和集成，以构成统一的用户管理、统一的资源管理和统一的权限控制；把学校建设成面向校园内外的一个超越时间、空间的虚拟大学。     

MMP-2和MMP-9与脑损伤及其法医学意义

基质金属蛋白酶2和9（MMP-2、MMP-9）是基质金属蛋白酶（matrix metalloproteinases，MMPs）家族中的两个成员，可降解Ⅳ型胶原、层粘连蛋白等基质成分，从而使血脑屏障结构破坏，通透性增加，导致血管源性脑水肿，在脑血管疾病和脑损伤形成过程中起着重要的作用。在损伤后不同时段，MMP-2和MMPO含量及分布均呈现一定的波动性，探讨这些问题对脑损伤的治疗及在法医学中推断脑损伤时间有十分重要的意义。本文就这些问题的相关研究作一概述。     

Policy Narratives across Two Languages: A Comparative Study using the Narrative Policy Framework

The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) focuses on the role of narratives, drawing from a rich scholarship in narrative, language, and culture. Despite the understanding that narratives are constructions of language and that narrative construction differs across languages, NPF studies have not focused on policy narratives in languages other than English. Language characteristics of narratives are important to assess the stability of policy narratives when there are multiple dominant languages in a political system. This study investigates the use of narrative elements in policy narratives in agricultural biotechnology policy in India across Hindi and English media coverage to examine the NPF assumption that narratives have generalizable narrative elements irrespective of variation in linguistic context and, specifically, tests the transportability of narrative elements. Findings validate the transportability of narrative elements in Hindi narratives, indicate variation in the use of narrative elements over time, and have implications for applying NPF across languages.     

Conservation in Context: Toward a Systems Framing of Decentralized Governance and Public Participation in Wildlife Management

Governance scholars have long championed the adaptive utility of decentralized management institutions, in part due to their ability to bring diverse stakeholders into decision‐making processes. However, research into the link between decentralization and participation often looks at policy design but bypasses important system feedbacks that shape sustained participation over time. To paint a more robust picture detailing how decentralization and participation are related, this paper uses a complex systems framework to explore interacting structural, operational, and cultural components of decentralized wildlife governance institutions in the United States and Botswana. Through this comparative analysis, I argue that the landscape of public participation in decentralized governance institutions appears to be significantly impacted by three factors: 1) how decentralization processes occurred, 2) where in the process of decision making participation is situated, and 3) perceptions of power distribution between groups with competing interests.