PCR扩增循环数与低拷贝模板DNA的STR分型

目的探讨PCR扩增循环数对低拷贝模板DNA的STR分型的影响。方法模板DNA(9947A)的不同扩增用量(含低拷贝模板量),采用ProfilerPlus试剂盒,扩增循环数分别为28、30、32、34、38次,3100型基因分析仪(ABI,美国)检测结果。结果循环数从28次增至38次,模板DNA量最低检出量可从0.25ng减少至0.0312ng;先循环28次后,每反应加0.3μlAmpliTaqGoldDNA聚合酶,再循环6次较1次34个循环的检测灵敏度高,相当于1次38个循环的效果。结论增加PCR扩增循环数,可能影响低拷贝模板DNA的STR分型。     

低拷贝模板DNA分析技术研究进展

近年来,低拷贝（LCN）模板类生物物证在法医DNA分析中占有了越来越重要的地位。用于低拷贝模板DNA的检测方法也得到飞速发展。本文通过对各种LCN-DNA分析技术如增加扩增循环数、纯化扩增产物、全基因组扩增、激光捕获显微切割等检测方法的综述,以及对LCN—DNA检测结果的分析评价,全面介绍LCN分析技术在法庭科学应用的最新进展及存在问题。最大限度地拓展低拷贝模板类生物物证在刑事司法领域的应用。     

PCR扩增循环数增加对低拷贝模板STR分型的影响

低拷贝模板(low copy number,LCN)最初由Gill等[1]定义为低于100pg的DNA模板量.但Budowle等人[2]认为LCN定义为"正常分析随机阈值以下的任何结果的分析和解释"更为合适.应用低于试剂盒规定的最小DNA模板量进行STR扩增检验,并对结果加以分析解释,被定义为低拷贝模板STR分型[3].     

低拷贝模板STR分型及其存在的问题

微量、超微量生物学检材的STR分型常常是案件调查中进行DNA分析的难点。多年来 ,法医DNA分析工作者一直努力探索对微量DNA进行分析的方法。应用少于试剂盒规定的最小DNA模板量进行STR扩增检验 ,并对结果加以分析解释 ,被定义为低拷贝模板 (lowcopynumber ,LCN )STR分型[1、2 ] 。LCN STR分型不同于标准的STR分型 ,在实际应用中也存在许多问题需要引起注意[1～ 5] 。为了避免在LCN STR分型中出现误判 ,本文对如何正确地使用LCN STR分型技术加以介绍。1　LCN STR分型根据生产厂家的推荐 ,标准STR分型方法使用最低的模板…     

脱落毛发及毛干DNA的STR分型研究

目的探讨脱落毛发及毛干细胞核DNA提取、含量和STR分型问题。方法对脱落毛发或毛干进行DNA提取和定量,使用低扩增体系、增加循环次数和多次平行扩增等方法扩增DNA样本,采用叠加比较的方法分析STR分型。结果15cm脱落毛发样品DNA含量大于0．3ng的样品占52．8％,STR分型成功率为55．6％;15cm毛干样品DNA含量大于0．3ng的样品占30．6％,STR分型成功率为25％。结论采用增加循环次数、多次平行扩增等LCN—STR分型方法和Mini—STR试剂盒有助于脱落毛发及毛千的STR基因座分型获得。     

低拷贝DNA模板检验方法探讨

目的探讨扩增及检测方法对低拷贝DNA模板分型检测灵敏度的影响。方法Control DNA 9947A按比例稀释,采用IdentifilerTM和DNATyper15TM试剂扩增,循环参数设置为28和28+6个循环,平行扩增3次,分别单独检测及3次合并检测,使用310及3130分析仪检测。结果28+6个循环的基因座检出率高于28个循环;等位基因不平衡及丢失与基因座没有特异性的关联,随着DNA模板量的减少,等位基因不平衡及丢失增多;将3次扩增产物混合后检测,等位基因不平衡及丢失情况减少,分型正确率增高。结论模板DNA分3次扩增后混合检测、循环数为28+6,可提高低拷贝模板基因座的检出率。     

多重置换扩增技术用于法医学微量DNA检测效果

目的探讨多重置换扩增(MDA)技术对法医学微量DNA样品STR检测分型的效果。方法用MDA技术对不同模板量DNA进行全基因组扩增(WGA),扩增产物用实时荧光定量PCR技术定量、用Profiler PlusTM试剂盒检测基因型。结果该方法可对模板DNA增加104～106倍。1ng样品DNA的MDA产物可获得9个STR基因座和Amelogenin性别基因座的准确分型结果;低于0.1ng的样品DNA经MDA扩增后,基因座检出数增加,但可见等位基因不平衡或丢失现象。结论MDA技术可有效增加DNA模板量和提高微量DNA分型效果。但样品DNA量低于0.1ng时,MDA产物的STR分型结果判读须慎重。     

多重置换扩增技术用于法医学微量DNA检测效果

目的探讨多重置换扩增（MDA）技术对法医学微量DNA样品STR检测分型的效果。方法用MDA技术对不同模板量DNA进行全基因组扩增（WGA）．扩增产物用实时荧光定量PCR技术定量、用Prrfiler Plus^TM试剂盒检测基因型。结果该方法可对模板DNA增加10^4～10^6倍。1ng样品DNA的MDA产物可获得9个STR基因座和Amelogenin性别基因座的准确分型结果；低于0．1ng的样品DNA经MDA扩增后，基因座检出数增加。但可见等位基因不平衡或丢失现象。结论MDA技术可有效增加DNA模板量和提高微量DNA分型效果。但样品DNA量低于0．1ng时，MDA产物的STR分型结果判读须慎重。     

8种方法显现的汗潜指印STR分型研究

目的研究常见指印显现方法对指印STR检验的影响。方法采用Invisorb spin forensic试剂盒提取纯化人汗潜指印DNA,低拷贝模板(LCN)STR复合扩增,荧光电泳检验。结果用铜粉、铝粉、荧光粉、黑磁粉、"502"胶、茚三酮、磺酸双三嗪荧光显色液显现的玻片、纸张和胶带纸粘面上的汗潜指印可成功进行STR分型。结论常见指印显现方法不影响指印STR检验。     

15重快速STR复合扩增体系的构建

目的建立一套15重快速STR复合扩增体系。方法选择14个常染色体基因座以及1个性别基因座,采用Fast Start Taq DNA聚合酶系统,以DNA标准品9947A为模板,通过筛选扩增条件、选择热启动酶用量、调整引物平衡、优化快速扩增程序、筛选反应缓冲液、选择反应体系以及筛选添加剂等一系列复合扩增实验,比较各条件下等位基因丢失和非特异性扩增情况。结果在以1 ng DNA为模板、0.4μL聚合酶及10×Fast Start高保真反应缓冲液构成10μL快速体系的条件下,32 min即可获得标准DNA全部15个STR基因座的完整分型,无等位基因丢失和非特异性扩增现象,等位基因均衡性良好。同时,5%甘油、0.01%明胶、0.05%明胶和5 mmol/L硫酸铵可作为PCR扩增过程中拟加入的反应添加剂。结论本研究建立的15重快速STR复合扩增体系可以明显缩短反应时间,提高样品检测效率。     

Multiplex short tandem repeat amplification of low template DNA samples with the addition of proofreading enzymes

Abstract:  With <100 pg of template DNA, routine short tandem repeat (STR) analysis often fails, resulting in no or partial profiles and increased stochastic effects. To overcome this, some have investigated preamplification methods that include the addition of proofreading enzymes to the PCR cocktail. This project sought to determine whether adding proofreading polymerases directly in the STR amplification mixture would improve the reaction when little template DNA is available. Platinum Taq High Fidelity and GeneAmp High Fidelity were tested in Profiler Plus? STR reactions alone and in combination with AmpliTaq^® Gold. All reactions included the additional step of a post‐PCR purification step. With both pristine low template DNA and casework samples, the addition of these polymerases resulted in comparable or no improvement in the STR amplification signal. Further, stochastic effects and artifacts were observed equally across all enzyme conditions. Based on these studies, the addition of these proofreading enzymes to a multiplex STR amplification is not recommended for low template DNA work.     

STR DNA typing: increased sensitivity and efficient sample consumption using reduced PCR reaction volumes

Improvements in detection limits/sensitivity and lower sample consumption are potential benefits of reducing PCR reaction volumes used in forensic DNA typing of crime scene samples. This premise was studied first with experimental mixtures and a nine-loci megaplex, which demonstrated stochiometric amplification and accurate detection. Next, adjudicated casework samples were subjected to amplification under 15 different template DNA to PCR reaction volume ratios. Reduction of PCR reaction volume and DNA down to 10 microL and 0.500 ng, respectively, produced identical profiles with the same signal intensity and heterozygous allele peak height ratio (HR). Reduction to 5 microL and 0.063 ng yielded HR values that were slightly affected in one to three STR loci. PCR reaction volume reduction can enhance detection and sensitivity while reducing the consumption of irreplaceable crime scene samples.     

荧光定量PCR技术验证Sinofiler试剂盒的适宜模板量

目的探讨Sinofiler试剂盒适合扩增的模板DNA用量。方法选取经Sinofiler试剂盒基因分型且图谱完整、扩增均衡性好的DNA样本,进行荧光定量PCR检测。结果实验结果表明,在12.5μL体系中,1.29～1.51ng的模板DNA能够获得理想的分型结果。结论应用荧光定量PCR技术检测不同试剂盒适合扩增的模板DNA用量是一种准确、有效的方法。     

Validation of the Short Amplicon Multiplex Q8 Including the German DNA Database Systems*

Abstract: We have developed a concept to enable the analyzing of degraded stains with limited DNA template quantity. Therefore we have constructed a short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex including the German DNA database systems (Q8). The amplicon lengths are smaller than 280 bp. For the validation of Q8 over 50 degraded samples were investigated. Amplifications were performed with “low copy number” PCR, the number of PCR cycles was increased to 33 and the reaction volume was decreased to 12.5 μL. Compared with the MPX2 and Nonaplex kit, the average success rate was increased using the Q8 kit by approximately 20% and 30%, respectively. The efficiency of a sensitive STR multiplex with reduced amplicon lengths was confirmed in comparing the success rates of Q8 for typing degraded samples and samples with limited amount of DNA template while partial profiles were observed with the majority of the samples using commercially available kits.     

改良IPEP法用于痕量DNA检测的实验研究

目的探讨改良扩增前引物延伸(IPEP)法对痕量DNA样本STR检测分型的效果。方法用改良IPEP法对痕量样品DNA进行全基因组扩增(WGA),扩增产物用实时荧光定量PCR技术定量、用AmpFLSTR~ Indentifiler~试剂盒作基因型检测。结果该方法可增加模板DNA约200~1100倍。基因组DNA不低于0.025ng时,可获得15个STR基因座和Amelogenin性别基因座的分型结果。基因组DNA0.01~0.025ng时,可获得9个以上基因座的分型结果。结论改良IPEP法可有效提高痕量DNA样本STR分型检验的灵敏度,有较好的实用价值。     

A systematic approach to improve downstream single-cell analysis for the DEPArray™ technology

Most commercially available STR amplification kits have never been fully validated for low template DNA analysis, highlighting the need for testing different PCR kits and conditions for improving single-cell profiling. Here, current strategies rely mainly on adjusting PCR cycle number and analytical threshold settings, with a strong preference for using 30 amplification cycles and thresholds at 30–150 RFU for allele detection. This study aimed to (1) determine appropriate conditions for obtaining informative profiles utilizing a dilution series, and (2) test the outcome on single cells using the DEPArray™ technology. Four routinely applied forensic STR kits were compared by using three different amplification volumes and DNA dilutions down to 3.0 pg, while two well-performing kits were used for single/pooled leucocyte and sperm cell genotyping. Besides reduced costs, the results demonstrate that a 50%–75% PCR volume reduction was beneficial for peak height evaluation. However, this was counteracted by an increased artifact generation in diluted DNA volumes. Regarding profile completeness, the advantage of volume reduction was only prominent in samples processed with Fusion 6C. For single and pooled cells, ESIFast and NGMDetect provided a solid basis for consensus profiling regarding locus failure, although locus dropouts were generally observed as stochastic events. Amplification volume of 12.5 μL was confirmed as appropriate in terms of peak heights and stutter frequencies, with increased stutter peaks being the main artifact in single-cell profiles. Limitations associated with these analyses are discussed, providing a solid foundation for further studies on low template DNA.     

Validation of reduced-scale reactions for the Quantifiler Human DNA kit

Accurate quantification of DNA samples is an important step in obtaining accurate and reproducible short tandem repeat (STR) profiles. Quantitative real-time-PCR has improved the speed and accuracy of DNA quantification over earlier methods, albeit at significantly greater cost per reaction. Here, the performance of reduced volume (10 microL) DNA quantification assays using the Quantifiler Human DNA Quantification Kit was evaluated using commercial standards and single source biological stains (e.g., venous blood, saliva, and semen). In addition, casework-type samples including those subjected to environmental contaminants containing PCR inhibitors and samples having undergone extensive DNA degradation were also quantified. The concentration of DNA in various forensic samples ranged from 0 to 2.9 ng/microL depending on sample source and/or environmental insult. Compared to full-scale reactions, reduced volume assays displayed equivalent to improved amplification efficiency and sample-to-sample reproducibility (+/-0.01-0.17 C(T FAM)). Furthermore, the use of data from reduced-scale Quantifiler reactions facilitated the accurate determination of the amount of sample DNA extract needed to generate quality STR profiles. The use of 10 microL-scale Quantifiler reaction volumes has the practical benefit of increasing the effective number of reactions per kit by 250%; thereby reducing the cost per assay by 60% while consuming less sample. This is particularly advantageous in cases of consumptive testing.     

车辆上脱落细胞STR检验

目的对汽车方向盘及变速杆把手上的皮肤脱落细胞进行STR检验研究。方法用EZ-tape采集车辆方向盘及变速杆上的脱落细胞,Chelex-100法与磁珠法结合提取DNA,延长保温时间。定量后调整PCR反应体系,适当增加PCR循环数,增加PCR产物量及延长进样时间进行电泳检测,使用GeneMapperIDV3.2软件进行STR分型。同时,对比使用多重置换扩增技术对提取的DNA进行全基因组扩增。结果对33份车辆方向盘和变速杆上脱落细胞的检测,其中19份检出全部基因座的基因分型结果,9份检出部分基因型,5份未检出DNA分型结果。而利用多重置换扩增技术未获得满意图谱。结论本研究建立的脱落细胞收集、DNA提取、PCR扩增及检测方法适合于车辆上脱落细胞的检验,其结果优于使用多重置换扩增技术获得的分型。