衣物类生物检材DNA检验的研究

目的建立对衣物类生物检材STR检验的有效自动提取纯化方法。方法对100例衣物类生物检材用EZ1DNA Investigator试剂盒、EZ1Advanced XL工作站的Large-Volume程序(大体积法)进行提取纯化,AmpFLSTR~Identifiler~Plus荧光STR复合扩增,3500x L型遗传分析仪分析结果。结果 69份检材中检出了单一DNA分型结果,9份检出了混合基因型,22份未检出基因型。结论该方法对衣物类生物检材DNA提取纯化后进行荧光STR检测,可应用于法庭科学实践。     

接触性检材502胶熏显后手印脱落细胞的DNA提取

目的建立接触性检材中手印定位、检材转移、DNA提取纯化的方法。方法 66例接触性检材经502胶熏显,手印接触部位明确后,分别采用普通擦拭法及丙酮擦拭法进行检材上手印脱落细胞的转移,并使用超微量磁珠法试剂盒提取纯化手印脱落细胞DNA,扩增后分析结果。结果用丙酮擦拭法得到的33例检材有30份获得了较好的STR分型结果,峰值范围为1 000~4 000 RFU,峰型均匀;而普通擦拭法很难获得理想的STR分型。结论通过丙酮擦拭法转移502胶熏显的手印脱落细胞,STR分型效果更优良,可应用于法庭科学实践。     

DNA IQ磁珠法结合Maxwell~（TM） 16自动仪提取接触DNA

目的研究DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪对接触DNA提取的应用价值。方法 151份案件接触DNA检材95℃裂解后,采用DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪提取DNA,然后进行DNA定量和STR分型检测,统计各种类型的接触DNA含量I、PC CT值和STR分型成功率。结果 151份案件接触DNA检材中,除果核平均DNA获得量为9.51ng以外,其它接触检材的平均DNA获得量均大于10ng,烟蒂检验成功率最高为93%,果核检验成功率较低,为60%。所有DNA样品的IPC CT值均在27左右,纯度高。结论大部分接触DNA检材采用DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪可提取到足以进行STR分型的DNA。     

车辆上脱落细胞STR检验

目的对汽车方向盘及变速杆把手上的皮肤脱落细胞进行STR检验研究。方法用EZ-tape采集车辆方向盘及变速杆上的脱落细胞,Chelex-100法与磁珠法结合提取DNA,延长保温时间。定量后调整PCR反应体系,适当增加PCR循环数,增加PCR产物量及延长进样时间进行电泳检测,使用GeneMapperIDV3.2软件进行STR分型。同时,对比使用多重置换扩增技术对提取的DNA进行全基因组扩增。结果对33份车辆方向盘和变速杆上脱落细胞的检测,其中19份检出全部基因座的基因分型结果,9份检出部分基因型,5份未检出DNA分型结果。而利用多重置换扩增技术未获得满意图谱。结论本研究建立的脱落细胞收集、DNA提取、PCR扩增及检测方法适合于车辆上脱落细胞的检验,其结果优于使用多重置换扩增技术获得的分型。     

车辆上脱落细胞STR检验

目的对汽车方向盘及变速杆把手上的皮肤脱落细胞进行STR检验研究。方法用EZ-tape采集车辆方向盘及变速杆上的脱落细胞,Chelex-100法与磁珠法结合提取DNA,延长保温时间。定量后调整PCR反应体系,适当增加PCR循环数,增加PCR产物量及延长进样时间进行电泳检测,使用GeneMapperIDV3.2软件进行STR分型。同时,对比使用多重置换扩增技术对提取的DNA进行全基因组扩增。结果对33份车辆方向盘和变速杆上脱落细胞的检测,其中19份检出全部基因座的基因分型结果,9份检出部分基因型,5份未检出DNA分型结果。而利用多重置换扩增技术未获得满意图谱。结论本研究建立的脱落细胞收集、DNA提取、PCR扩增及检测方法适合于车辆上脱落细胞的检验,其结果优于使用多重置换扩增技术获得的分型。     

人体接触检材前处理方式对磁珠法提取DNA效果的影响

目的比较3种常见的接触检材前处理方式对磁珠法提取DNA效果的影响。方法收集烟蒂、牙刷、纱线手套各10份;分别采用95℃、70℃直接裂解和TNE、SDS、PK预消化方式进行前处理,再用磁珠法提取纯化DNA,并进行DNA定量,统计提取的接触DNA量和IPC CT值;同时用Sinofiler复合扩增系统进行STR分型检测。结果 3种方法前处理后用磁珠提取的DNA纯度均较高I,PC CT值在26.63～27.19之间。用预消化法获得的DNA量高于裂解法,而95℃裂解与70℃裂解方法提取的DNA量无显著性差异。STR扩增检测结果亦表明,采用预消化法处理的样品STR分型成功率高于裂解法9,5℃与70℃裂解方法处理的样品STR分型成功率无显著性差异。结论人体接触检材采用预消化磁珠法提取DNA,有助于提高STR检验成功率。     

衣物载体上人体脱落细胞的负压吸附采集法

目的建立脱落细胞负压吸附方法,用于DNA检验中衣物等载体上人体脱落细胞的采集。方法检材包括由志愿者佩带1、5、10、20m in纱线手套,穿着5、10、20m in的内衣以及外套、鞋、帽子、头套、袜子、水杯、矿泉水瓶等。在吸尘器的进风口处连接特制的吸筒,一端覆盖具有拦截和静电吸附细胞能力的特制吸附膜,选择适当负压对各检材相应部位进行吸扫。收集吸附膜上的脱落细胞,采用Chelex-100法提取DNA,AmpFLSTR Identifiler复合扩增试剂盒扩增检测。结果上述检材用本文负压吸附法采集人体脱落细胞,经检验均获得清晰、完整的STR分型图谱,并与检材提供者的基因型一致。结论本文建立的脱落细胞负压吸附技术可有效吸附载体上的脱落细胞,适用于DNA检案实践。     

刑事现场188份接触DNA检材法医学检验分析

目的分析188份接触DNA检材的提取、送检和检验结果,探讨接触DNA检出率及可能影响接触DNA检验的因素。方法收集本辖区2016年1月至2016年10月提取并送检的188份接触DNA检材,按照检材载体性质、提取方法、送检时间、检出率等进行分类,采用SPSS13.0软件对数据进行统计分析和χ2检验。结果188份接触DNA检材成功进行STR分型的有38份,检出率为20.21%;其中表面质软、粗糙的载体接触DNA检出率58.82%,高于其它载体接触DNA检出率组的差异具有统计学意义;直接原物提取的接触DNA检材检出率42.11%,高于脱落细胞粘取器提取、棉签拭子转移提取的检出率组的差异具有统计学意义;送检时间早的检材检出率高于送检时间晚的检材组且具有统计学意义。结论接触DNA检材的检出率受载体性质、提取方法、送检时间等因素影响,日常现场勘查时要注重发现检出率高的载体上的接触DNA选择适当的方法提取,并及时送检。     

尼龙膜套管分离技术对混合斑中精子细胞DNA的提取

目的建立新型的混合斑中精子细胞分离的方法,并评价其应用价值。方法收集性侵案件中的40份混合斑检材,分别采用常规差异裂解法和尼龙膜套管分离技术进行精子细胞分离,使用硅膜试剂盒(Forensic DNA Extraction Kit for Soft Tissues)提取精子细胞DNA,Amp FlSTR~ Identifiler~ Plus PCR扩增试剂盒进行PCR扩增,3500x L基因分析仪进行电泳检测,并对两种分离方法的结果进行对比。结果 40份混合斑检材中,采用尼龙膜套管分离技术的检材仅3份有女性成分微弱残留,余均获得了完整的单一男性分型。而采用常规差异裂解法分离的检材中,有25份完全未检出男性精子细胞STR分型,15份检出男性精子细胞STR分型(7份不完整男性精子细胞STR分型,6份有女性成分残留,2份单一的男性精子细胞STR分型)。结论本研究建立的尼龙膜套管分离技术适用于混合斑中精子细胞的分离,特别是对含有大量女性细胞而精子细胞较少的检材提取效果明显,整个提取实验成本低廉、快速简便。     

茚三酮显现汗潜指印的三种操作方法对DNA检测的影响

目的探讨并比较茚三酮显现汗潜指印的3种操作方法,即溶液浸泡法、涂抹法和喷雾法对后续DNA检测带来的影响。方法取16名志愿者的指印分4组,分为茚三酮浸泡法、涂抹法和喷雾法以及空白组,然后提取DlNA进行定量和STR分型检测。结果3种操作方法都会减少汗潜指印DNA的量,喷雾法的损失量最大,浸泡法和涂抹法结果比较接近。结论现场可疑指印检材,应根据检验需要决定指印显现和DNA提取的先后顺序。     

两种包装方式对小体积生物检材DNA检验的影响

目的探讨一种适用于小体积生物物证检材的包装方式。方法选择M4型螺丝钉作为研究对象,经去污消毒处理,通过手握方式转移人体脱落细胞到其表面,对螺丝钉采用两种不同的包装方式(滤纸包裹和悬空固定),经KingFisher Flex自动提取工作站进行DNA提取,从基因座等位基因检出情况、STR分型谱带峰高、均衡性等方面比较两种包装方式对螺丝钉上DNA检出率的影响。结果悬空固定包装螺丝钉实验组获得的STR分型谱带峰高、均衡性等方面均优于滤纸包裹包装实验组,其在基因座检出数量、分型完全相同样本数及有效分型样本数方面也多于滤纸包裹包装实验组。结论为降低微量生物检材DNA二次转移造成的损耗,提高小体积生物检材DNA的检出率,建议对小体积生物检材采用悬空固定方式进行物证包装。     

Evaluation of the DNA stability of forensic markers used in betel-quid chewers' oral swab samples and oral cancerous specimens: implications for forensic application

Chewed betel-quid (BQ) residues are often considered vital biological evidence at crime scenes, since the human DNA extracted from the residues is actually from buccal epithelial cells and can be associated with suspects. BQ-chewing is also a risk factor for oral diseases and/or cancers. Archived medical oral-specimens can be used to identify specific individuals under adverse conditions, although STR markers are known to be unstable in various tumor tissues. This study evaluates the DNA stability of forensic marker systems in BQ-chewers' oral epithelial cells, and in archived clinical specimens of oral cancer patients. The genotypes of oral and paired peripheral blood samples in 200 subjects were compared, using the commercialized typing systems of HLA-DQA1, PM (including LDLR, GYPA, HBGG, D7S8, and GC loci), and AmpFlSTR markers (including 9 STR loci and the Amelogenin gene). The 100 healthy BQ-chewers had consistent oral swab and paired blood sample genotypes analyzed withboth DQA1/PM and STR marker systems. In the 100 oral cancer patients, one discordant result at D7S8 was found in the 600DQA1/PM-marker loci, and 25 allelic alterations with expansion or contraction were detected in the 900 STR loci. The findings herein suggest that when cancerous specimens were tested, the HLA-DQA1/PM system with point polymorphism appears more reliable than the STR system with length polymorphism. Our results also indicate that healthy BQ-chewers' oral cotton swabs containing buccal epithelial cells are useful for forensic purposes using the HLA-DQA1, PM, and STR marker systems.     

Chelex-100法提取脱落细胞检材DNA的实时定量研究

目的研究脱落细胞检材DNA检验的简便有效的提取方法。方法对76份包括帽子、眼镜、牙刷、剃须刀、梳子、口香糖、羊水在内的7种脱落细胞检材采用Chelex-100法提取DNA,在ABI7500型荧光定量PCR仪上进行定量,同时用Identifiler复合扩增系统扩增,在ABI3130遗传分析仪上进行STR分型。结果从帽子（头套）中获得的脱落细胞DNA平均含量为8.31ng,眼镜擦拭物上获得的脱落细胞DNA平均含量为6.20ng,牙刷上获得的脱落细胞DNA平均含量为49.40ng,剃须刀擦拭物上获得的脱落细胞DNA平均含量为6.92ng、梳子擦拭物上获得的的脱落细胞DNA平均含量为10.68ng,口香糖的脱落细胞DNA平均含量为16.30ng,羊水的脱落细胞DNA平均含量为320ng。以上76份检材性别及10个以上STR位点分型成功率为75.8%。结论从帽子、眼镜、牙刷、剃须刀、梳子、口香糖、羊水等检材提取的脱落细胞可用Chelex-100法提取DNA作STR分型。     

微量体表脱落上皮细胞的DNA检验

目的　建立微量体表脱落上皮细胞的DNA检验方法。　方法　采用Chelex -10 0法提取DNA ,以Microcon -10 0纯化柱纯化浓缩DNA ,用ProfilerPlus试剂盒PCR扩增后用 3 10基因分析仪检测。　结果　 10种常见粘附有体表脱落上皮细胞的样本 10 0个 ,其中 7种 70个样本成功检测到 10个STR位点的分型 ,检出率为 10 0 % ,其余 3种样本检出率分别为 5 0 %、2 0 %、10 % ,将该方法应用于 2例实际检案 ,取得满意效果。　结论　所建立方法稳定可靠 ,易于操作 ,适用于多种检材 ,为微量体表脱落上皮细胞的DNA检验提供了确实可行的检验方法     

微量口腔脱落细胞检材的DNA检验

目的寻求提高微量口腔脱落细胞检材的DNA检验成功率的简便有效的提取方法。方法对不同载体上的100份微量口腔脱落细胞检材采用小体积Chelex-100法提取DNA,在ABI7500型荧光定量PCR仪上进行定量,同时用IdentifilerTM复合扩增系统扩增,在ABI3130遗传分析仪上进行STR分型。结果从25根饮料吸管上提取的DNA量在0.72～116.7.8ng,16个水杯杯缘提取的DNA量在2.15-142.5ng,31个饮料瓶(罐)口提取的DNA量在1～34.65ng,10根筷子上提取的DNA量在3.35～26.6ng,12个果核中提取的DNA量在0.294～21.4ng,6份吃剩的骨头中提取的DNA量在0.88～5.88ng。100份检材性别及9个以上STR位点分型成功率平均为59.38%。除了使用者的个人原因外,检材的提取送检方式、检材的质地、饮料的性质对提取的DNA量有显著影响,是否加蛋白酶K对提取的DNA量无显著影响。结论采用小体积Chelex-100法可对60%左右的微量口腔脱落细胞检材提取DNA进行STR分型。     

激光显微捕获技术用于尿液脱落细胞DNA检测

目的采用激光显微捕获技术（LCM）捕获尿液脱落细胞,并进行STR分型。方法收集10份健康成人尿液样本,根据储存时间分组,其中新鲜尿液组（≤24h）分别采用Chelex-100及LCM联合DNA IQTM提取法提取DNA,储存尿液组（〉24h）再分为4℃组和室温组,分别在4～30d内不同时间点采用LCM联合DNA IQTM提取法提取DNA;各组提取的模板DNA进行扩增及SRT分型检验。结果新鲜尿液组采用LCM联合DNA IQTM提取法提取DNA,所有样本均可检出全部基因座（16个）,采用Chelex-100法则在部分基因座上出现等位基因丢失、非特异性扩增、峰值低等现象;4℃储存10d和室温储存4d以内的尿液经检验可明确判读12个以上基因座,4℃20～30d及室温7d,可检出7个以上基因座。结论 LCM技术可用于尿液检材的DNA分型检验,且检材应尽可能4℃保存并尽快检验。     

福尔马林固定组织SNP与STR检测的比较

目的检测经长期福尔马林固定的组织降解情况,并比较组织中SNP与STR的检出率。方法本文对24例经福尔马林固定、-20℃保存5年的组织样本,采用Quantifiler?Trio DNA定量试剂盒检测样本DNA的降解系数及浓度,运用55-SNPs SNa Pshot复合分型体系和Power Plex?21试剂盒分别进行SNP与STR检测。结果大部分样本降解系数在1~8,发生不同程度的降解。与未降解样本相比,SNP分型完全一致,检出率为100%;其中8例样本STR分型存在33个等位基因丢失,降解系数均大于2.6,且75.8%的等位基因片段长度大于300bp。当样本检测出16个STR基因座时,似然率与54个SNP相当。当样本检出大于17个STR时,似然率大于54个SNP。STR基因座片段长度与等位基因检出率之间呈负相关。除2例样本降解系数较小却发生等位基因丢失外,其余样本降解系数与等位基因检出率之间呈负相关。结论经福尔马林长期固定的组织DNA易降解,检测SNP明显优于STR,但需要更多的SNP以提高个体识别能力。     

Analysis of non-suspect samples lacking visually identifiable sperm using a Y-STR 10-plex

Y-STRs are valuable in the investigation of sexual assaults in which autosomal STR genotype interpretation is challenging. To detect male DNA from compromised sexual assault evidence, 45 non-suspect samples were differentially extracted and analyzed with 10 Y-STRs. These samples were positive for the presence of human seminal fluid, but were negative for spermatozoa by microscopic examination. Y-STR data were obtained in approximately 86.2% of the epithelial or sperm fractions. On samples yielding incomplete profiles, results were obtained on an average of 5 loci per sample. The inability to obtain results may be due to insufficient amplifiable male DNA, PCR inhibition, or unfounded accusations of sexual assault. This study indicates that it is possible to obtain a male STR profile even in the absence of visually identifiable spermatozoa. Furthermore, Y-STR loci should become components of CODIS if they are to be used in solving non-suspect sexual assaults.     

改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法提取混合斑精子DNA

目的采用改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法提取混合斑中精子DNA,并评价其应用价值。方法收集52例经常规差异裂解法检验含有女性分型的混合斑检材,采用改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法提取精子细胞DNA,IdentifilerTM试剂盒进行PCR扩增检验。并将常规差异裂解法结果作为对照。结果52例混合斑检材中,采用改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法检出单一男性精子成分有38例,男性分型检出率达到98．08％。结论改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法适合提取混合斑中精子DNA。     

Allelic alterations at the STR markers in the buccal tissue cells of oral cancer patients and the oral epithelial cells of healthy betel quid-chewers: an evaluation of forensic applicability

Although cancerous specimens are usually not used in forensic DNA typing, they might be forcibly employed under certain instances. On the other hand, though the oral epithelial samples have been applied to forensic identification, the great popularity of betel quid (BQ)-chewing in Taiwan, which is known to be a risk factor leading to an oral cancer, makes this application questionable. The DNA stability of nine short tandem repeat (STR) markers (the AmpFlSTR kit) was first investigated and then used to evaluate the forensic appropriateness of the oral samples of both healthy BQ-chewers and the archived clinical specimens from oral cancer patients. The analyses were performed on buccal samples from 100 BQ-chewers and 100 oral cancer patients, as well as their paired peripheral blood samples, and a group of 100 non-BQ-chewers were used for the control. In the group of 100 oral cancer patients, two types of DNA instability were found. They were major allelic imbalance, and allelic alterations including the expansion, the contraction and the un-classified type (i.e. can not be confirmed as the expansion or the contraction). The overall percentage of the cancerous subjects demonstrating DNA instability was 33% (five patients possessing both types of DNA instability). Both types of DNA instability showed a tendency of increasing with the severity of the pathological stage of oral cancer. Forty-four occurrences of major allelic imbalance were found from 21 cancer patients. The statistical result revealed that there was no significant difference in the allelic imbalanced occurrence among the nine STR loci. Allelic alterations were found in 17 patients, within which 12 individuals had the expansion, five had the contraction, and three were the un-classified type. Further, among these 17 patients, three were found to acquire multiple allelic alterations at multiple loci. In the group of 100 unrelated healthy BQ-chewers, two loci with major allelic imbalance were detected. However, the two imbalanced alleles were virtually half lost, and could still be recognized as heterozygous alleles. The statistical results of ANOVA, chi(2), and Scheffe tests indicated that the means of allelic imbalance at the nine STR loci of the oral cancerous group revealed a significant difference from those in the control group. Our results suggest that oral cancer tissues cannot be used as references for forensic purposes using the PCR-based STR systems, whereas the oral swabs from healthy BQ-chewers can be employed, but should be done with caution.