FISH联用激光捕获显微分离技术对混合斑进行分离检验

目的建立荧光原位杂交(FISH)联用激光捕获显微分离技术(LCM)精确分离男女混合斑中精子的检验方法。方法收集健康志愿者精子和女性阴道上皮细胞制备模拟混合斑,经过预处理后用Vysis CEPX SpectrumOrangeTMY SpectrumGreenTM试剂盒进行荧光原位杂交,并用PALM激光捕获显微分离系统分离男、女性细胞,使用Identifiler试剂盒结合低体积扩增技术分别对男女成分进行STR扩增。结果荧光原位杂交后,可清晰分辨混合斑中的男女细胞。捕获20个精子细胞可以得到完整的STR分型,检出率为80%。随着精子数目增多,检出率提高而等位基因丢失率降低。30个精子检出率最高,为95%。结论激光捕获显微分离联用FISH技术可用于混合斑中男女细胞DNA的分离检验。     

激光显微捕获技术用于尿液脱落细胞DNA检测

目的采用激光显微捕获技术（LCM）捕获尿液脱落细胞,并进行STR分型。方法收集10份健康成人尿液样本,根据储存时间分组,其中新鲜尿液组（≤24h）分别采用Chelex-100及LCM联合DNA IQTM提取法提取DNA,储存尿液组（〉24h）再分为4℃组和室温组,分别在4～30d内不同时间点采用LCM联合DNA IQTM提取法提取DNA;各组提取的模板DNA进行扩增及SRT分型检验。结果新鲜尿液组采用LCM联合DNA IQTM提取法提取DNA,所有样本均可检出全部基因座（16个）,采用Chelex-100法则在部分基因座上出现等位基因丢失、非特异性扩增、峰值低等现象;4℃储存10d和室温储存4d以内的尿液经检验可明确判读12个以上基因座,4℃20～30d及室温7d,可检出7个以上基因座。结论 LCM技术可用于尿液检材的DNA分型检验,且检材应尽可能4℃保存并尽快检验。     

激光捕获显微分离技术分离多人混合精斑

目的利用激光捕获显微分离技术(LCM)分离多供体混合精斑。方法将3名自愿者供给的精液混合后,制备成混合精斑,并涂于覆膜玻片上。用PALM激光捕获显微分离系统切割并捕获样本中的单个精子,利用低体积扩增技术(LV-PCR)扩增并进行检测,并对分型结果进行统计。结果联用LCM和低体积扩增技术捕获样本中单个精子细胞进行扩增,可获得每位自愿者的Y-STR分型,分型成功率为73.15%。结论激光捕获显微分离联用低体积扩增技术可完成多供体混合精斑的分离检验。     

单细胞分离荧光原位杂交法用于男女混合血DNA分型

目的采用单细胞分离荧光原位杂交法精确分离混合血样中男性和女性细胞并进行分型检验。方法收集男、女性血,按照男∶女为1∶5、1∶10、1∶20制备混合血样,加入0.075mol/L KCl 600μL,轻混、放置30min后加入150μL固定液离心留沉淀涂片,利用Vysis 30-161050试剂盒进行荧光原位杂交,并用PALM激光显微捕获系统分离出男、女性细胞,使用Identifiler试剂盒复合扩增并进行检测。结果捕获8个血细胞即可得到完整的DNA分型,且随着细胞数目的增多,检出率逐渐提高而等位基因丢失率逐渐降低。10个血细胞的检出率最高,为93.75%。5μL男性血液与本实验各比例女性血混合用本文方法检验均可获得男性分型。案例混合血斑经检验获得单一男性和女性分型。结论单细胞分离荧光原位杂交法可用于男女混合血样本中DNA分型检验。     

不同织物上血斑洗涤后DNA检验结果分析

目的分析评价织物上洗涤过的血斑DNA检验的效果。方法取棉、化纤和麻布块各25份,用40μL新鲜血均匀涂制成直径约1.5cm的圆形血斑,样本分为5组,分别在加有皂粉的洗衣机中洗涤1、3、10、30、60min;所有样本用IQ试剂盒提取DNA,用Identifiler PlusTM试剂盒扩增,并进行STR分型检测。结果各种载体血斑周边处检材中,仅棉布载体洗涤1min检材检出RFU200的峰,但等位基因丢失率可达50%以上,不能正确判型。各种载体血斑检材洗涤30min以内均可得到成功分型,但峰高以棉布最高、化纤最低,洗涤60min时仅棉布血斑检出率为100%,其他载体血斑均有明显的等位基因丢失及非特异性扩增,检出率低于60%。结论洗涤一定时间后的血迹仍具有DNA分型检验的价值,能否正确提取洗涤后的血迹检材是分型成功的关键,洗涤时间较长的检材判型应谨慎。     

Maxwell 16裂解纯化法提取陈旧精子DNA的应用

目的利用Maxwell 16裂解纯化法从保存8年以上陈旧精斑检材中获取精子DNA。方法 8份陈旧精斑检材采用Maxwell 16裂解纯化法提取精子DNA,并采用Powerplex○R21试剂盒进行复合扩增,产物用AB3130型遗传分析仪检测,结果与常规方法进行对比。结果成功获得8份陈旧精斑检材精子STR分型。结论差异裂解配合Maxwell 16裂解在陈旧精斑检材精子DNA检验中效果明显。     

混合斑中精子细胞分离及其DNA制备方法

目的尝试建立一种检测混合斑中精子细胞的方法。方法使用显微操作法捕获精子细胞,全基因组扩增(多重置换扩增)精子细胞DNA。结果对10管精斑检材的全基因组扩增,获得了高产、保真的产物。使用50μL体系对20个精子细胞直接进行全基因组扩增,省去了对起始模板的纯化过程,DNA扩增倍数达30000倍以上,片段长度大多在15 kb以上,其STRs复合扩增分型结果有可参照性。结论显微操作法可以有效捕获精子细胞,排除干扰,多重置换扩增可以提供足够量的产物用于法医DNA分析,该方法具有可行性。     

激光显微捕获口腔上皮细胞的DNA分型

目的探索激光显微技术(lasercapturemicrodissectionsystem,LCM)捕获口腔上皮细胞,并进行STR-DNA分型检测的方法。方法用VERITAS显微切割仪红外低能激光显微捕获一定数量口腔上皮细胞,进行ProfilerPlus试剂盒STR复合扩增,检测DNA基因型。结果7～8个口腔上皮细胞能成功获得STR-DNA分型。3～4个口腔上皮细胞不能成功获得STR-DNA分型。结论激光显微捕获作为一种分离单个细胞的新技术,对于微量口腔上皮细胞的STR-DNA分型是可行的。     

全基因组扩增在微量检材DNA分型中的应用

目的探索全基因组扩增技术对微量检材DNA分型的有效性。方法通过显微操作制备含1~20个细胞的模拟微量检材样本,在常规PCR-STR分型前加入全基因组扩增步骤,从等位基因不平衡、等位基因丢失、基因座丢失、伪等位基因(包含stutter峰)等方面探究PEP和MDA两种全基因组扩增方法对微量检材DNA分型的有效性。结果 MDA扩增效率高于PEP,但等位基因丢失和伪等位基因严重;PEP方法的正确分型率高于MDA,但小片段DNA优势扩增现象较严重。结论 MDA方法并不适合目前以STR分型为主导的法庭科学,当微量检材样本的绝对量相当少时,可以考虑使用PEP方法来扩大样本量,以满足重复检验的要求,但可能面临大片段DNA扩增失败的风险。     

wizard clean up在混合斑DNA检验中的应用

目的建立一种快速、简单、有效的混合斑DNA检验方法。方法在100例检案中,利用wizardcleanup直接对精子消化液进行纯化浓缩。采用profilerplus试剂盒进行复合扩增,产物经ABI310基因分析仪检测。结果从混合斑中成功获得精斑10个STR位点的DNA分型。结论wizardcleanup处理混合斑,能有效去除女性成份,得到精斑DNA进行分型。     

激光捕获显微切割技术用于分离混合斑中精子细胞

目的 评估激光捕获显微切割(laser capture microdissection.LCM)技术在分离混合斑中少量精子细胞的应用价值.方法 配制不同比例的精液-阴道上皮细胞混合液.分别用差异裂解法和LCM法分离精子细胞,用磁珠法提取精子细胞DNA,并用IdentifilerTM试剂盒进行STR基因型检测.结果 LC...     

车辆内接触DNA检测方法的分析比较

目的探讨汽车内接触DNA的分离方法及遗传标记分型效率。方法收集单人长期驾驶的11辆小型轿车,采用粘取法和擦拭法富集方向盘、变速杆和手刹三个部位的脱落细胞,采用磁珠法和硅胶膜法提取基因组DNA,采用GoldenEye^TM 20A和PowerPlex■Fusion进行扩增,并对检验结果进行比较分析。结果方向盘在基因座分型正确率、等位基因drop-in和drop-out基因座比率、单基因座正确率以及单基因座等位基因drop-in和drop-out率六个方面均表现最好,其次为变速杆,最差为手刹;擦拭法和粘取法之间DNA提取在获得的DNA总量和STR检测正确成功率方面无统计学差异;PPFusion与20A的总体基因座分型比较正确率无差异,但单基因座正确率优于20A,drop-out发生率低于20A,drop-in发生率高于20A。结论汽车内脱落细胞的检测可优先采集方向盘部位,根据载体质地选择擦拭法或粘取法采集脱落细胞,选用硅胶膜法或磁珠法提取DNA,PPFusion和20A两个试剂盒均可,分析结果时需特别注意drop-in和drop-out。     

微量DNA的短串联重复序列分型可行性

目的了解微量DNA分型的法医学应用的可行性。方法一系列浓度的DNA模板用PowerPlexTM16System试剂盒扩增,并用ABI377DNA测序仪进行短串联重复序列(STR)的分型。结果当模板量小于250pg时,部分位点发生了等位基因漏扩,并出现非特异带、杂合子扩增不平衡等干扰分型的杂峰。结论上述这些不正常的现象可能会导致分型错误。在对微量检材的DNA检验结果进行判型时一定要小心谨慎,全面考虑。     

A novel FTA™ elute card collection method that improves direct DNA amplification from bloodstained concrete

Concrete is a common construction material found in residential and commercial buildings, bridges and parking lots that is a composite matrix containing aggregate held together with cement. The porous nature of concrete can make the collection and genotyping of biological fluids, such as blood, challenging. Forensic evidence can become embedded within the matrix, potentially reducing the amount of DNA available for analysis. In forensic science, “direct” amplification refers to a genotyping method that amplifies a DNA profile directly from a sample without DNA extraction, saving time and money. We investigated a novel application of Whatman? FTA? Elute cards in their ability to directly amplify PowerPlex® Fusion and Y23 profiles from minute amounts of blood that had been deposited on different concrete structures. In comparison to traditional collection methods, directly profiling blood stained construction materials using FTA? Elute cards increased the percentage loci amplified and significantly improved both allele peak height and peak height ratio while reducing allelic drop-out. FTA? Elute cards can provide a reliable, inexpensive and superior alternative to traditional methods.     

Estimating drop-out probabilities of STR alleles accounting for stutters,detection threshold truncation and degradation

Allelic drop-out continues to be a challenge to forensic geneticists when interpreting crime scene evidence and calculating the evidential weight. Methods exist for estimating the probability of allelic drop-out, where the most promising methods use the signal intensities as input for quantifying the drop-out probability. Using data from real crime cases, we demonstrate that taking degradation of the biological material and truncation of the data due to a detection threshold into account is superior to previous approaches. An additional correction for stuttering effects showed limited improvement.     

激光捕获显微分离技术在DNA检验中的应用研究

目的建立一套显微细胞捕获技术用于法医学生物检材DNA检验方法。方法使用VeritasTM LCM激光捕获仪,采用紫外加红外的捕获方式,对框架覆膜玻片上经苏木素染色口腔上皮细胞进行捕获,采用改良硅珠法提取细胞DNA,使用Identifiler TM试剂盒在5μL体系中进行PCR扩增。结果成功获得20个口腔上皮细胞的13个以上完整STR基因座分型谱带。结论本研究建立的方法适合法医学生物检材制成的染色涂片上细胞的DNA检验。     

Dealing with allelic dropout when reporting the evidential value in DNA relatedness analysis

A method is suggested that allows the use of loci that have shown allelic dropout in kinship analysis as used for disaster victim identification (DVI) and missing person work (MP). This approach uses an extension of a previously published approach to modelling allelic dropout. This method may salvage some information in cases where allelic dropout is hindering DVI or MP work particularly in reconciliations involving a large number of bodies and pedigrees. It should not replace the pursuit of more complete DNA profiles by the normal rework process for such samples.     

A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis.

DNA STR profiles have been generated from 1 ng and low copy number (LCN) templates using 28 and 34 cycles of amplification, respectively. Characteristics which facilitate the interpretation of profiles, such as heterozygous balance, allelic dropout and stutter proportions have been quantified. We demonstrate that a reduction in DNA template coupled with an increase in amplification cycle number produces an increased rate of allelic dropout out which can be correlated to the peak areas of those alleles observed. In addition, the LCN conditions increase the degree of peak area asymmetry observed from heterozygotes and the size range of stutters. Analysis of the data allows us to develop sets of guidelines appropriate for interpreting both single and mixed DNA profiles.