DNase-Ⅰ纯化结合碱性裂解法提取混合斑精子DNA

目的研究脱氧核糖核酸酶I(DNase-I)纯化结合碱性裂解法提取混合斑精子DNA的方法在法医学中的应用。方法收集79份性犯罪案件混合斑检材,分别用DNase-I纯化结合碱性裂解法和差异裂解法提取精子DNA,采用STR荧光标记复合扩增体系进行16个STR基因座分型,并比较检验结果。结果应用DNase-I纯化结合碱性裂解法提取精子DNA,64例检材分型成功;应用差异裂解法提取精子DNA,57例检材分型成功;两种方法比较结果存在显著性差异(P=0.039),DNase-1纯化结合碱性裂解法提取精子DNA的STR分型成功率更高,成本低廉。结论DNase-I纯化结合碱性裂解法提取混合斑精子DNA可提高检验成功率,操作简便,快速,易于自动化,适于法医学个体识别鉴定。     

DNase-I纯化结合碱性裂解法提取混合斑精子DNA

目的研究脱氧核糖核酸酶I(DNase-I)纯化结合碱性裂解法提取混合斑精子DNA的方法在法医学中的应用。方法收集79份性犯罪案件混合斑检材,分别用DNase-I纯化结合碱性裂解法和差异裂解法提取精子DNA,采用STR荧光标记复合扩增体系进行16个STR基因座分型,并比较检验结果。结果应用DNase-I纯化结合碱性裂解法提取精子DNA,64例检材分型成功;应用差异裂解法提取精子DNA,57例检材分型成功;两种方法比较结果存在显著性差异(P=0.039),DNase-1纯化结合碱性裂解法提取精子DNA的STR分型成功率更高,成本低廉。结论DNase-I纯化结合碱性裂解法提取混合斑精子DNA可提高检验成功率,操作简便,快速,易于自动化,适于法医学个体识别鉴定。     

精斑检材的3种提取方法比较

在日常检案中,精斑检材提取,常规应用Chelex-100法和酚/氯仿抽提法获得精子DNA。Chelex-100法耗时短,提取的精子的DNA量多,但所含的杂质也多,常影响扩增结果。酚/氯仿抽提法获得精子的DNA纯度高,但抽提过程中要用到有毒的化学制剂,消化、抽提耗时长,且抽提过程易造成DNA损失。本文直接应用磁珠法裂解提取精子DNA,获得优于Chelex-100法的高纯度的DNA,且把精斑的提取时间从酚/氯仿抽提法的2~3d缩减到7~8h。同时尝试了一步消化后的精斑检材,使用DNA自动工作站进行DNA提取,大大提高了办案效率。1材料与方法1.1精斑检材性犯罪案件中含…     

改良EVO150-8方法在DNA自动化检案中的应用

目的探讨改良EVO150-8方法在批量生物检材DNA检验中的应用价值,建立一种自动化、简单、快速的DNA提取方法。方法采用改良EVO150-8自动化核酸提取纯化仪器与DNA IQ磁珠法纯化试剂盒,对各现场提取的880份血迹、烟蒂、口香糖、精斑（混合斑）、组织、骨骼、脱落细胞等常见生物检材进行DNA提取与纯化,采用Identifiler试剂盒进行扩增检验,用3130XL电泳,GeneMapper ID V3.2分析软件进行分析比对。结果在880份生物检材中,有836份检材成功获得STR分型;检验92份检材仅需时128min。结论改良EVO150-8适合批量生物检材的自动化提取。     

精子富集柱分离技术的研究

目的在传统差异裂解法基础上,研究建立新的混合斑检材中精子分离技术。方法根据精细胞的结构特点,研制精子富集柱。取混合斑检材经第一步消化后的混合液,加入精子富集柱中离心,使DNA等小分子物质透过,而精细胞被特异性黏附和拦截在富集层中。采用本文技术和常规裂解方法对12份混合斑检材中精子进行分离,分离后精子DNA采用Identifiler试剂盒进行PCR扩增和电泳检测。结果混合斑检材经精子富集柱分离后均获得单一男性精子的STR分型结果,而12份检材用常规裂解方法分离,其中有6份检材女性成分去除不完全或未能检出精子STR基因型。结论本研究建立的精子富集柱分离技术适用于常见混合斑检材中精子的分离,特别适合对含有大量女性混合物而精子量较少检材的分离提取。     

改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法提取混合斑精子DNA

目的采用改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法提取混合斑中精子DNA,并评价其应用价值。方法收集52例经常规差异裂解法检验含有女性分型的混合斑检材,采用改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法提取精子细胞DNA,IdentifilerTM试剂盒进行PCR扩增检验。并将常规差异裂解法结果作为对照。结果52例混合斑检材中,采用改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法检出单一男性精子成分有38例,男性分型检出率达到98．08％。结论改良差异裂解法结合硅珠法适合提取混合斑中精子DNA。     

一种改良的精斑涂片DNA检验方法

目的建立一种有效的精斑涂片DNA检验方法。方法以本实验室平时积累的91例精斑涂片为研究对象,采用chelex法提取,结合硅珠法纯化浓缩,提高DNA浓度后进行PCR扩增和STR分型。结果尽管涂片上精子量较少,但chelex法的DNA提取率较高,且硅珠法可以纯化并浓缩模板DNA,本文建立的方法兼具了这两种提取方法的优点,成功率较高。结论精斑涂片可以作DNA检验,在法医检案中具有较高的应用价值。     

3种DNA提取法在污染严重混合斑分型中的应用比较

目的比较Chelex-100法、酚/氯仿法和二氧化硅膜法3种DNA提取法在污染严重混合斑分型中的应用效果。方法从日常案例中收集污染严重的混合斑25份,差异消化法分离精子后同时用Chelex-100法、酚/氯仿法和二氧化硅膜技术3种方法提取DNA,采用PCR-STR技术对D19S253、FGA和CSF1PO 3个基因座进行分型,Gel-Pro软件处理电泳图谱,SPSS软件分析比较不同方法之间的差异。结果采用Chelex-100法提取DNA,25份检材分型结果均未成功;采用酚/氯仿法,25份检材中10份分型成功,3份检材FGA和CSF1PO基因座可分型,4份检材CSF1PO基因座可分型;采二氧化硅膜纯化法,25份检材均成功分型;酚/氯仿法和二氧化硅膜法两种方法比较,结果存在显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论二氧化硅膜纯化技术可以有效去除PCR抑制物,提取的DNA扩增效果明显优于Chelex-100法和酚/氯仿法,具有较高的应用价值。     

微量PCR反应体系在两种试剂盒中的应用

美国AB I公司的Profiler PlusTM试剂盒和Identifi-lerTM试剂盒在当前法医DNA检案中应用广泛,但价格昂贵。本实验利用5μl体系进行PCR扩增取得满意效果,降低了检验成本。1材料与方法1.1材料法医DNA检案中常规检材,血痕、精斑、烟蒂和毛发(带毛囊)各20份。Profiler PlusTM试剂盒和IdentifilerTM试剂盒(AB I,USA)。1.2方法1.2.1 DNA提取上述检材采用Chelex-100法[1]提取模板DNA。取9mm2血痕加入5%Chelex-100150μl,56℃2h;精斑经两步法视镜检精子量多少酌情加入5%Chelex-100 150~250μl,PK 10μl(2mg/m l),DTT 10μl(1mol/L…     

用Chelex100法及有机溶剂提取法联合提取DNA扩增STR基因座的比较研究

为了比较不同方法提取DNA扩增STR基因座的成功率 ,本文用Chelex10 0法及Chelex10 0法联合有机溶剂提取法分别提取性犯罪案件 6份血斑及 6份混合斑中精子DNA ,并用PE公司ProfilerPlus系统复合扩增 ,ABI 310型基因分型仪检测。结果表明 ,常规采用Chelex10 0法提取血斑及精斑等生物检材DNA作STR基因座检验失败或所检测的位点较少时 ,应对Chelex10 0法提取的DNA上清液再用有机溶剂提取法提取 ,可极大提高DNA检验成功率。采用本文建立的Chelex10 0法联合有机溶剂提取法 ,提高了PCR扩增阳性率 ,对实际检案很有帮助 ;在PCR扩增前应常规进行DNA定量检验 ,否则对于重要检材应进行梯度扩增。     

STR and Y-STR genotyping of 30–50-year-old semen stains

This study performed the semen discrimination test, short tandem repeat (STR) typing, and Y-chromosome specific-STR (Y-STR) typing on five, 30–50-year-old semen stains. All samples reacted positively with the SM test reagent, and we observed sperm heads in all samples microscopically. The quantity of DNA extracted from the 43- and 50-year-old samples was much lower than from the other samples. STR typing of the 30-, 32-, 32-, 43-, and 50-year-old semen samples detected a maximum of 13, 15, 15, 11, and 6 of 15 loci, respectively, while Y-STR typing detected 16, 16, 16, 10, and 10 of 16 loci. These results suggest that the semen discrimination test and STR and Y-STR typing can detect extremely old semen stains and are useful for forensic practice.     

利用AutoMate Express~(TM)系统提取陈旧性骨骼DNA

目的建立利用AutoMate Express~(TM)系统提取陈旧性骨骼DNA的方法。方法将骨骼用冷冻研磨机研磨成骨粉,经AutoMate Express~(TM)系统提取后,用Identifiler~Plus、MiniFiler~(TM)试剂盒扩增分型。结果10例保存在不同环境中、死亡时间在10~20年的骨骼样本利用AutoMate Express~(TM)系统3 h内完成DNA提取,有8例获得完整STR分型。结论 AutoMate Express~(TM)系统能快速、高效地提取陈旧性骨骼DNA,可应用于法医实际案件检验。     

DNA IQ磁珠法结合Maxwell~（TM） 16自动仪提取接触DNA

目的研究DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪对接触DNA提取的应用价值。方法 151份案件接触DNA检材95℃裂解后,采用DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪提取DNA,然后进行DNA定量和STR分型检测,统计各种类型的接触DNA含量I、PC CT值和STR分型成功率。结果 151份案件接触DNA检材中,除果核平均DNA获得量为9.51ng以外,其它接触检材的平均DNA获得量均大于10ng,烟蒂检验成功率最高为93%,果核检验成功率较低,为60%。所有DNA样品的IPC CT值均在27左右,纯度高。结论大部分接触DNA检材采用DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪可提取到足以进行STR分型的DNA。     

超滤管在陈旧生物检材中的应用

目的探讨millipore超滤管滤过方法对陈旧生物检材DNA分型检验的应用价值。方法将23份陈旧血样分别剪取同样合适大小的血片3组,标为A、B、C组,磁珠法提取DNA,分别用80μL、80μL、20μL洗脱液洗脱得到模板DNA,其中A、C组模板直接扩增,B组用millipore超滤管滤过浓缩后扩增。PCR产物用AB3130x L基因分析仪检测,Gene Mapper ID V3.2软件进行自动分型。所得实验数据用SPSS软件分析处理。结果 A组没有1例样本扩出全部STR基因座,B组有18例样本扩出全部STR基因座,C组有11个样本扩出全部STR基因座。结论应用millipore超滤管滤过方法可以明显提高陈旧生物检材的DNA分型成功率。     

应用自动化工作站提取常见生物样本DNA

目的建立使用自动化工作站提取法医案件生物样本DNA的方法。方法选用Biomek 3000自动化工作站,采用DNA IQTM系统及Chelex法对法医案件中常见生物样本进行DNA提取,荧光定量技术进行定量,PCR扩增16个STR基因座并与手工提取方法比较。结果与手工提取方法进行比较,选用自动化工作站结合使用DNAIQTM系统及Chelex法提取DNA可获得满意的STR检验结果。结论自动化工作站可用于法医案件中常见生物样本的DNA提取。     

Possibilities of DNA sex determination in hair roots

Species- and sex-determination on hair roots were simultaneously performed using extracted DNA and a human Y chromosomespecific probe. (pH Y 2.1) After Southern hybridization, Hae III-digested DNA fragments were detected by non-radioactive digoxigenin detection system. DNA was extracted from one to five freshly plucked hair roots. The specific 2.12 kb fragment was successfully detected in male DNA samples from a single hair root. A positive identification of female DNA was more difficult. The hair root DNA was revealed to be stable at room temperature for at least 2 weeks (examination time) and produced the same specific band pattern as the DNA of fresh hair roots. In the blind tests with DNA samples from randomly plucked one to four hair roots, the rate of successful sex-determination was 95.8% on male samples (23 out of 24 samples) and 25% on female samples (4 out of 16 samples).     

用chelex-100提取骨骼DNA的研究

建立了应用chelex-100加蛋白酶K提取骨骼DNA的方法,并对1～30年31例骨骼进行了实验.该方法操作简单、快速、重复性好,灵敏度以及阳性率高,适用于法医学鉴定.     

用引物Y_3,Y_4和DNA扩增技术作血液(痕)和毛根性别鉴定的研究

作者用引物Y_3、Y_4和DNA聚合酶链式反应(PCR)作微量人类血液(痕)和毛根的性别鉴定。扩增的靶序列位于Y染色体DNA特异3.4kb重复序列中,扩增产物为460bp。检材用量为:新鲜血液0.5μl、血痕纱纤维1mm、毛根单个。20例保存4个月的血痕与2例保存6年半的血痕性别判定结果均正确,无性别记载的保存9～11年的3例血痕显现了清晰的460bpY特异DNA扩增带。15例保存20天的自然脱落毛根性别判定结果均正确。本法省略了检材处理中的酚-氯仿抽提DNA等纯化步骤,既简化了实验操作,又减少了检验过程中外源DNA的污染机会和样品DNA的损耗,使这一性别鉴定方法更符合法医学实践的需要。     

Comparison of two methods for isolating DNA from human skeletal remains for STR analysis

Abstract: The quality and efficiency of a standard organic DNA isolation method and a silica‐based method using the QIAGEN Blood Maxi Kit were compared to obtain human DNA and short tandem repeats (STRs) profiles from 39 exhumed bone samples for paternity testing. DNA samples were quantified by real‐time PCR, and STR profiles were obtained using the AmpFlSTR^® Identifiler^® PCR amplification kit. Overall, the silica‐based method recovered less DNA ranging from 0 to 147.7 ng/g (average 7.57 ng/g, median = 1.3 ng/g) than did the organic method ranging from 0 to 605 ng/g (average 44.27 ng/g, median = 5.8 ng/g). Complete profiles (16/16 loci tested) were obtained from 37/39 samples (95%) using the organic method and from 9/39 samples (23%) with the silica‐based method. Compared with a standard organic DNA isolation method, our results indicate that the published silica‐based method does not improve neither the quality nor the quantity of DNA for STR profiling.     

Biological and DNA evidence in 1000 sexual assault cases

Using a Filemaker-based database (DNA Pro-FILES, Synchrone Infosystème Inc.), we have conducted a large-scale study on 1000 sexual assault (SA) cases where a standardized kit was submitted to our laboratory alone or with other types of exhibits. We looked at the likelihood of obtaining good quality DNA evidence, allegedly from the assailant, according to a number of parameters.The overall proportion of SA cases with DNA evidence is nearly 50%. A little more than 30% of SA kits provided DNA evidence while for 16% of cases DNA evidence could be obtained only from other exhibits.The likelihood of obtaining DNA evidence is approximately 50% in teenager and adult SA cases, but much lower for children 10 years old or younger (15%). In children cases, profiles were found mostly on clothing or skin swabs.The likelihood of obtaining DNA evidence from vaginal swabs remains good for up to 3 days after the assault (from 35% on the first day to 23% on the third day). A DNA profile was obtained from approximately 22% of anal/rectal swabs and 41% of skin swabs taken less than 1 day after the assault. Less than 10% of oral washes provided DNA evidence, all having been collected within 24 h of the assault.We found that in bodily samples, a negative result for acid phosphate (AP) is a poor predictor of the likelihood of obtaining good quality DNA evidence. Approximately 15% of vaginal swabs and 8% of anal swabs negative for AP nevertheless provided good quality DNA evidence.